Learning Refined Document Representations for Dense Retrieval via Deliberate Thinking
On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent dense retrievers increasingly leverage the robust text understanding capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), encoding queries and documents into a shared embedding space for effective retrieval. However, most existing methods represent each document with a single embedding, which is less effective at capturing its multifaceted semantics and thereby limits matching accuracy. In this paper, we propose Deliberate Thinking based Dense Retriever (Debater), a novel approach that enhances document representations by incorporating a step-by-step thinking process. Debater introduces a Chain-of-Deliberation mechanism, which iteratively refines document embeddings through a continuous chain-of-thought. To integrate information from various thinking steps, Debater further employs a Self Distillation mechanism that identifies and fuses the most informative steps into a unified embedding. Experimental results show that Debater significantly outperforms existing methods across several retrieval benchmarks, demonstrating superior accuracy and robustness. All codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/OpenBMB/DEBATER.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.
Builds on
15 of 61 references.
References · 15
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
- 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 763
- 2022Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 358
- 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 357
- 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
- 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 307
- 2022SGPT: GPT Sentence Embeddings for Semantic Searchcited by 204
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5.
5 papers.
- 2025Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 72
- 2025Don't "Overthink" Passage Reranking: Is Reasoning Truly Necessary?cited by 7
- 2025QZhou-Embedding Technical Reportcited by 3
- 2025Learning to Reason with Mixture of Tokenscited by 3
- 2025Navigating Through Paper Flood: Advancing LLM-based Paper Evaluation through Domain-Aware Retrieval and Latent Reasoningcited by 2
- 2025Learning to Reason with Mixture of Tokens25 Sep 2025
- 2025QZhou-Embedding Technical Report29 Aug 2025
- 2025Navigating Through Paper Flood: Advancing LLM-based Paper Evaluation through Domain-Aware Retrieval and Latent Reasoning7 Aug 2025
- 2025Don't "Overthink" Passage Reranking: Is Reasoning Truly Necessary?22 May 2025
- 2025Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning22 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Xetrieval: Mechanistically Explaining Dense Retrieval
- 2025Exploring Reasoning-Infused Text Embedding with Large Language Models for Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval
- 2025Your Dense Retriever is Secretly an Expeditious Reasoner
- 2025ELITE: Embedding-Less retrieval with Iterative Text Exploration
- 2026Latent Abstraction for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2026Taxonomy of the Retrieval System Framework: Pitfalls and Paradigms
- 2026A Systematic Investigation of Document Chunking Strategies and Embedding Sensitivity
- 2024JudgeRank: Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning-Intensive Reranking