mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Corpus-Based Approaches to Igbo Diacritic Restoration

arXiv 2601.18380 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.CY cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With natural language processing (NLP), researchers aim to enable computers to identify and understand patterns in human languages. This is often difficult because a language embeds many dynamic and varied properties in its syntax, pragmatics and phonology, which need to be captured and processed. The capacity of computers to process natural languages is increasing because NLP researchers are pushing its boundaries. But these research works focus more on well-resourced languages such as English, Japanese, German, French, Russian, Mandarin Chinese, etc. Over 95% of the world's 7000 languages are low-resourced for NLP, i.e. they have little or no data, tools, and techniques for NLP work. In this thesis, we present an overview of diacritic ambiguity and a review of previous diacritic disambiguation approaches on other languages. Focusing on the Igbo language, we report the steps taken to develop a flexible framework for generating datasets for diacritic restoration. Three main approaches, the standard n-gram model, the classification models and the embedding models were proposed. The standard n-gram models use a sequence of previous words to the target stripped word as key predictors of the correct variants. For the classification models, a window of words on both sides of the target stripped word was used. The embedding models compare the similarity scores of the combined context word embeddings and the embeddings of each of the candidate variant vectors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.

Builds on

12 of 94 references.

References · 12

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  3. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
  4. 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 425
  5. 2013Exploiting Similarities among Languages for Machine Translationcited by 191
  6. 2016Exploring the Limits of Language Modelingcited by 173
  7. 2014Multilingual Models for Compositional Distributed Semanticscited by 18
  8. 2014BilBOWA: Fast Bilingual Distributed Representations without Word Alignmentscited by 16
  9. 2016Quantifying and Reducing Stereotypes in Word Embeddingscited by 15
  10. 2016Learning Crosslingual Word Embeddings without Bilingual Corporacited by 12
  11. 2013Multilingual Distributed Representations without Word Alignmentcited by 5
  12. 2014Learning Bilingual Word Representations by Marginalizing Alignmentscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.