mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Shortcut Learning in Binary Classifier Black Boxes: Applications to Voice Anti-Spoofing and Biometrics

arXiv 2601.17782 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread adoption of deep-learning models in data-driven applications has drawn attention to the potential risks associated with biased datasets and models. Neglected or hidden biases within datasets and models can lead to unexpected results. This study addresses the challenges of dataset bias and explores ``shortcut learning'' or ``Clever Hans effect'' in binary classifiers. We propose a novel framework for analyzing the black-box classifiers and for examining the impact of both training and test data on classifier scores. Our framework incorporates intervention and observational perspectives, employing a linear mixed-effects model for post-hoc analysis. By evaluating classifier performance beyond error rates, we aim to provide insights into biased datasets and offer a comprehensive understanding of their influence on classifier behavior. The effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated through experiments on audio anti-spoofing and speaker verification tasks using both statistical models and deep neural networks. The insights gained from this study have broader implications for tackling biases in other domains and advancing the field of explainable artificial intelligence.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2026.

Builds on

46 of 100 references.

References · 46

  1. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  4. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  5. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  6. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  7. 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 367
  8. 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 351
  9. 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 345
  10. 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 343
  11. 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 280
  12. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
34 more
  1. 2019Learning De-biased Representations with Biased Representationscited by 199
  2. 2019Causality matters in medical imagingcited by 193
  3. 2019RUBi: Reducing Unimodal Biases in Visual Question Answeringcited by 185
  4. 2021AASIST: Audio Anti-Spoofing using Integrated Spectro-Temporal Graph Attention Networkscited by 180
  5. 2022ASVspoof 2021: Towards Spoofed and Deepfake Speech Detection in the Wildcited by 121
  6. 2021Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image Captioningcited by 108
  7. 2024ASVspoof 5: Crowdsourced Speech Data, Deepfakes, and Adversarial Attacks at Scalecited by 91
  8. 2021Evading the Simplicity Bias: Training a Diverse Set of Models Discovers Solutions with Superior OOD Generalizationcited by 83
  9. 2021RawBoost: A Raw Data Boosting and Augmentation Method applied to Automatic Speaker Verification Anti-Spoofingcited by 67
  10. 2021Partial Counterfactual Identification from Observational and Experimental Datacited by 64
  11. 2021ECAPA-TDNN Embeddings for Speaker Diarizationcited by 47
  12. 2024A Decade's Battle on Dataset Bias: Are We There Yet?cited by 47
  13. 2021Learning Fair Classifiers with Partially Annotated Group Labelscited by 40
  14. 2021Speech is Silver, Silence is Golden: What do ASVspoof-trained Models Really Learn?cited by 37
  15. 2020Can I Trust My Fairness Metric? Assessing Fairness with Unlabeled Data and Bayesian Inferencecited by 31
  16. 2022Integrating Random Effects in Deep Neural Networkscited by 22
  17. 2022Bias in Automated Speaker Recognitioncited by 20
  18. 2021A Study On Data Augmentation In Voice Anti-Spoofingcited by 18
  19. 2024Clever Hans Effect Found in Automatic Detection of Alzheimer's Disease through Speechcited by 9
  20. 2022To train or not to train adversarially: A study of bias mitigation strategies for speaker recognitioncited by 8
  21. 2024Resampled Datasets Are Not Enough: Mitigating Societal Bias Beyond Single Attributescited by 7
  22. 2021Data Quality as Predictor of Voice Anti-Spoofing Generalizationcited by 6
  23. 2023How to Construct Perfect and Worse-than-Coin-Flip Spoofing Countermeasures: A Word of Warning on Shortcut Learningcited by 6
  24. 2023Spurious Correlations and Where to Find Themcited by 6
  25. 2013The distribution of calibrated likelihood-ratios in speaker recognitioncited by 5
  26. 2024The Unreliability of Acoustic Systems in Alzheimer's Speech Datasets with Heterogeneous Recording Conditionscited by 4
  27. 2022Design Guidelines for Inclusive Speaker Verification Evaluation Datasetscited by 3
  28. 2022Study on the Fairness of Speaker Verification Systems on Underrepresented Accents in Englishcited by 3
  29. 2023Benchmark Dataset Dynamics, Bias and Privacy Challenges in Voice Biometrics Researchcited by 3
  30. 2023A Study on Bias and Fairness In Deep Speaker Recognitioncited by 2
  31. 2021Towards Robust Waveform-Based Acoustic Modelscited by 1
  32. 2023Fairness and Privacy in Voice Biometrics:A Study of Gender Influences Using wav2vec 2.0cited by 1
  33. 2023Voice Anonymization for All -- Bias Evaluation of the Voice Privacy Challenge Baseline Systemcited by 1
  34. 2024As Biased as You Measure: Methodological Pitfalls of Bias Evaluations in Speaker Verification Researchcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.