Data-Free Privacy-Preserving for LLMs via Model Inversion and Selective Unlearning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit powerful capabilities but risk memorizing sensitive personally identifiable information (PII) from their training data, posing significant privacy concerns. While machine unlearning techniques aim to remove such data, they predominantly depend on access to the training data. This requirement is often impractical, as training data in real-world deployments is commonly proprietary or inaccessible. To address this limitation, we propose Data-Free Selective Unlearning (DFSU), a novel privacy-preserving framework that removes sensitive PII from an LLM without requiring its training data. Our approach first synthesizes pseudo-PII through language model inversion, then constructs token-level privacy masks for these synthetic samples, and finally performs token-level selective unlearning via a contrastive mask loss within a low-rank adaptation (LoRA) subspace. Extensive experiments on the AI4Privacy PII-Masking dataset using Pythia models demonstrate that our method effectively removes target PII while maintaining model utility.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2026.
Builds on
18 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Knowledge Swapping via Learning and Unlearning12 Feb
- 2024Towards Robust and Parameter-Efficient Knowledge Unlearning for LLMs13 Aug
- 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
- 2024Fast Exact Unlearning for In-Context Learning Data for LLMs1 Feb
- 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct
Other references · 13
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
- 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 434
- 2023Text Embeddings Reveal (Almost) As Much As Textcited by 192
- 2023Controlling the Extraction of Memorized Data from Large Language Models via Prompt-Tuningcited by 40
- 2023PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Modelscited by 37
- 2022Text Revealer: Private Text Reconstruction via Model Inversion Attacks against Transformerscited by 31
- 2023Do Localization Methods Actually Localize Memorized Data in LLMs? A Tale of Two Benchmarkscited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026On the Recoverability of Private Information Unlearning in Large Language Models
- 2024Protecting Privacy Through Approximating Optimal Parameters for Sequence Unlearning in Language Models
- 2025R.R.: Unveiling LLM Training Privacy through Recollection and Ranking
- 2026Operationalising the Right to be Forgotten in LLMs: A Lightweight Sequential Unlearning Framework for Privacy-Aligned Deployment in Politically Sensitive Environments
- 2024Preserving Privacy in Large Language Models: A Survey on Current Threats and Solutions
- 2024Privacy-Preserving Large Language Models: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Directions
- 2026MPU: Towards Secure and Privacy-Preserving Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models
- 2026Less is More: Geometric Unlearning for LLMs with Minimal Data Disclosure