mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Recoverability of Private Information Unlearning in Large Language Models

arXiv 2608.29943 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) can memorize sensitive information, raising serious privacy concerns. Machine unlearning offers a potential solution to remove such information, but it remains unclear whether existing methods truly erase it or merely hide it within the model. A key challenge is quantifying the persistence of sensitive data under a unified evaluation framework. To address this, we construct a synthetic dataset containing fake private information and propose a white-box auditing framework to systematically assess whether claimed-forgotten information is genuinely removed. Using this framework, we evaluate five existing unlearning methods and find that a simple "inverse greedy" decoding -- selecting the least likely token at each step -- can recover supposedly forgotten private information. Our results reveal that current unlearning approaches often fail to fully eliminate sensitive information, highlighting the need for more reliable methods to ensure privacy in deployed LLMs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 26 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2026.

Builds on

26 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 13

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization21 Oct
  2. 2024Do Unlearning Methods Remove Information from Language Model Weights?11 Oct
  3. 2024Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearning19 Jun
  4. 2024Reversing the Forget-Retain Objectives: An Efficient LLM Unlearning Framework from Logit Difference12 Jun
  5. 2024Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted Prompts12 Jun
  6. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
  7. 2024Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMs26 Feb
  8. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  9. 2023Large Language Model Unlearning14 Oct
  10. 2023In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few Shot Unlearners11 Oct
  11. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs3 Oct
  12. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct
1 more
  1. 2022Continual Learning and Private Unlearning24 Mar

Other references · 13

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  4. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  5. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  6. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
  7. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
  8. 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 303
  9. 2022Are Large Pre-Trained Language Models Leaking Your Personal Information?cited by 195
  10. 2023Can Sensitive Information Be Deleted From LLMs? Objectives for Defending Against Extraction Attackscited by 156
  11. 2021Counterfactual Memorization in Neural Language Modelscited by 155
  12. 2022Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacycited by 97
1 more
  1. 2024Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Modelscited by 42

Built on by

Not cited yet.