mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Protecting Privacy Through Approximating Optimal Parameters for Sequence Unlearning in Language Models

arXiv 2406.14091 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 10

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Although language models (LMs) demonstrate exceptional capabilities on various tasks, they are potentially vulnerable to extraction attacks, which represent a significant privacy risk. To mitigate the privacy concerns of LMs, machine unlearning has emerged as an important research area, which is utilized to induce the LM to selectively forget about some of its training data. While completely retraining the model will guarantee successful unlearning and privacy assurance, it is impractical for LMs, as it would be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Prior works efficiently unlearn the target token sequences, but upon subsequent iterations, the LM displays significant degradation in performance. In this work, we propose Privacy Protection via Optimal Parameters (POP), a novel unlearning method that effectively forgets the target token sequences from the pretrained LM by applying optimal gradient updates to the parameters. Inspired by the gradient derivation of complete retraining, we approximate the optimal training objective that successfully unlearns the target sequence while retaining the knowledge from the rest of the training data. Experimental results demonstrate that POP exhibits remarkable retention performance post-unlearning across 9 classification and 4 dialogue benchmarks, outperforming the state-of-the-art by a large margin. Furthermore, we introduce Remnant Memorization Accuracy that quantifies privacy risks based on token likelihood and validate its effectiveness through both qualitative and quantitative analyses.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 25 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2024.

Builds on

25 of 51 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct
  2. 2021Unrolling SGD: Understanding Factors Influencing Machine Unlearning27 Sep

Other references · 23

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  3. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  4. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  5. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  6. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  7. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  8. 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
  9. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,156
  10. 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 992
  11. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
  12. 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 713
11 more
  1. 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 662
  2. 2018Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-Powered Conversational agentscited by 530
  3. 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 412
  4. 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 400
  5. 2023Editing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunitiescited by 372
  6. 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 314
  7. 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 267
  8. 2022What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?cited by 195
  9. 2020Can You Put it All Together: Evaluating Conversational Agents' Ability to Blend Skillscited by 131
  10. 2016De-identification of Patient Notes with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 88
  11. 2022Kernelized Concept Erasurecited by 48

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 8; 2026: 1.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MPU: Towards Secure and Privacy-Preserving Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models
  2. 2026Data-Free Privacy-Preserving for LLMs via Model Inversion and Selective Unlearning
  3. 2026On the Recoverability of Private Information Unlearning in Large Language Models
  4. 2024Textual Unlearning Gives a False Sense of Unlearning
  5. 2024Machine Unlearning in Large Language Models
  6. 2025DP2Unlearning: An Efficient and Guaranteed Unlearning Framework for LLMs
  7. 2025Direct Token Optimization: A Self-contained Approach to Large Language Model Unlearning
  8. 2025Tokens for Learning, Tokens for Unlearning: Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks in Large Language Models via Dual-Purpose Training