mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RECAP: A Resource-Efficient Method for Adversarial Prompting in Large Language Models

arXiv 2601.15331 ↗First posted 20 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

The deployment of large language models (LLMs) has raised security concerns due to their susceptibility to producing harmful or policy-violating outputs when exposed to adversarial prompts. While alignment and guardrails mitigate common misuse, they remain vulnerable to automated jailbreaking methods such as GCG, PEZ, and GBDA, which generate adversarial suffixes via training and gradient-based search. Although effective, these methods particularly GCG are computationally expensive, limiting their practicality for organisations with constrained resources. This paper introduces a resource-efficient adversarial prompting approach that eliminates the need for retraining by matching new prompts to a database of pre-trained adversarial prompts. A dataset of 1,000 prompts was classified into seven harm-related categories, and GCG, PEZ, and GBDA were evaluated on a Llama 3 8B model to identify the most effective attack method per category. Results reveal a correlation between prompt type and algorithm effectiveness. By retrieving semantically similar successful adversarial prompts, the proposed method achieves competitive attack success rates with significantly reduced computational cost. This work provides a practical framework for scalable red-teaming and security evaluation of aligned LLMs, including in settings where model internals are inaccessible.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 10 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.

Builds on

10 of 10 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
  2. 2023PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Prompts7 Jun

Other references · 8

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  3. 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,463
  4. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
  5. 2024The Faiss librarycited by 376
  6. 2021Gradient-based Adversarial Attacks against Text Transformerscited by 234
  7. 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 184
  8. 2024IndicLLMSuite: A Blueprint for Creating Pre-training and Fine-Tuning Datasets for Indian Languagescited by 52

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Resurgence of GCG Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Models
  2. 2025Safeguarding Efficacy in Large Language Models: Evaluating Resistance to Human-Written and Algorithmic Adversarial Prompts
  3. 2026Adversarial Reframing: A Framework for Targeted Generation in Language Models
  4. 2024Adversarial Tuning: Defending Against Jailbreak Attacks for LLMs
  5. 2024AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMs
  6. 2025AutoAdv: Automated Adversarial Prompting for Multi-Turn Jailbreaking of Large Language Models
  7. 2024Fight Back Against Jailbreaking via Prompt Adversarial Tuning
  8. 2024Deciphering the Chaos: Enhancing Jailbreak Attacks via Adversarial Prompt Translation