mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deciphering the Chaos: Enhancing Jailbreak Attacks via Adversarial Prompt Translation

arXiv 2410.11317 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.CL cs.CRcited by 6

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic adversarial prompt generation provides remarkable success in jailbreaking safely-aligned large language models (LLMs). Existing gradient-based attacks, while demonstrating outstanding performance in jailbreaking white-box LLMs, often generate garbled adversarial prompts with chaotic appearance. These adversarial prompts are difficult to transfer to other LLMs, hindering their performance in attacking unknown victim models. In this paper, for the first time, we delve into the semantic meaning embedded in garbled adversarial prompts and propose a novel method that "translates" them into coherent and human-readable natural language adversarial prompts. In this way, we can effectively uncover the semantic information that triggers vulnerabilities of the model and unambiguously transfer it to the victim model, without overlooking the adversarial information hidden in the garbled text, to enhance jailbreak attacks. It also offers a new approach to discovering effective designs for jailbreak prompts, advancing the understanding of jailbreak attacks. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the success rate of jailbreak attacks against various safety-aligned LLMs and outperforms state-of-the-arts by large margins. With at most 10 queries, our method achieves an average attack success rate of 81.8% in attacking 7 commercial closed-source LLMs, including GPT and Claude-3 series, on HarmBench. Our method also achieves over 90% attack success rates against Llama-2-Chat models on AdvBench, despite their outstanding resistance to jailbreak attacks. Code at: https://github.com/qizhangli/Adversarial-Prompt-Translator.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 33 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2024.

Builds on

33 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 13

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Improved Generation of Adversarial Examples Against Safety-aligned LLMs28 May
  2. 2024AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMs21 Apr
  3. 2024AmpleGCG: Learning a Universal and Transferable Generative Model of Adversarial Suffixes for Jailbreaking Both Open and Closed LLMs11 Apr
  4. 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attacks2 Apr
  5. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreaks15 Feb
  6. 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs12 Jan
  7. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automatically4 Dec
  8. 2023Scalable and Transferable Black-Box Jailbreaks for Language Models via Persona Modulation6 Nov
  9. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries12 Oct
  10. 2023Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrations10 Oct
  11. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct
  12. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
1 more
  1. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?5 Jul

Other references · 20

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  7. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  8. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
  9. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  10. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
  11. 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 651
  12. 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 531
8 more
  1. 2023Hard Prompts Made Easy: Gradient-Based Discrete Optimization for Prompt Tuning and Discoverycited by 336
  2. 2023Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?cited by 315
  3. 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 247
  4. 2021Gradient-based Adversarial Attacks against Text Transformerscited by 234
  5. 2023Automatically Auditing Large Language Models via Discrete Optimizationcited by 191
  6. 2019Enhancing Adversarial Example Transferability with an Intermediate Level Attackcited by 140
  7. 2023Explore, Establish, Exploit: Red Teaming Language Models from Scratchcited by 114
  8. 2024PAL: Proxy-Guided Black-Box Attack on Large Language Modelscited by 50

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025AutoAdv: Automated Adversarial Prompting for Multi-Turn Jailbreaking of Large Language Models
  2. 2025Efficient and Stealthy Jailbreak Attacks via Adversarial Prompt Distillation from LLMs to SLMs
  3. 2026The Art of the Jailbreak: Formulating Jailbreak Attacks for LLM Security Beyond Binary Scoring
  4. 2026Jailbreaking Leaves a Trace: Understanding and Detecting Jailbreak Attacks from Internal Representations of Large Language Models
  5. 2025LatentBreak: Jailbreaking Large Language Models through Latent Space Feedback
  6. 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey
  7. 2024Adversarial Tuning: Defending Against Jailbreak Attacks for LLMs
  8. 2023A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easily