mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Intelligent Power Grid Design Review via Active Perception-Enabled Multimodal Large Language Models

arXiv 2601.14261 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2025cs.CV cs.HC cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Chart understanding and anomaly detection

Abstract (arXiv)

The intelligent review of power grid engineering design drawings is crucial for power system safety. However, current automated systems struggle with ultra-high-resolution drawings due to high computational demands, information loss, and a lack of holistic semantic understanding for design error identification. This paper proposes a novel three-stage framework for intelligent power grid drawing review, driven by pre-trained Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) through advanced prompt engineering. Mimicking the human expert review process, the first stage leverages an MLLM for global semantic understanding to intelligently propose domain-specific semantic regions from a low-resolution overview. The second stage then performs high-resolution, fine-grained recognition within these proposed regions, acquiring detailed information with associated confidence scores. In the final stage, a comprehensive decision-making module integrates these confidence-aware results to accurately diagnose design errors and provide a reliability assessment. Preliminary results on real-world power grid drawings demonstrate our approach significantly enhances MLLM's ability to grasp macroscopic semantic information and pinpoint design errors, showing improved defect discovery accuracy and greater reliability in review judgments compared to traditional passive MLLM inference. This research offers a novel, prompt-driven paradigm for intelligent and reliable power grid drawing review.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Chart understanding and anomaly detection, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2025.

Builds on

14 of 23 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  5. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  6. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  7. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  8. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  9. 2016Revisiting Active Perceptioncited by 90
  10. 2024CAD-MLLM: Unifying Multimodality-Conditioned CAD Generation With MLLMcited by 74
  11. 2017A Dataset for Developing and Benchmarking Active Visioncited by 50
  12. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning in Computer Vision: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 42
2 more
  1. 2025ACTIVE-o3: Empowering MLLMs with Active Perception via Pure Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
  2. 2023Transformers in Small Object Detection: A Benchmark and Survey of State-of-the-Artcited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MMArch: Benchmarking Multimodal Reasoning Grounded in Architectural Evidence
  2. 2026DrawingVQA: A Real-World Benchmark for Multi-Depth Visual-Textual Reasoning on Construction Drawings
  3. 2026MechVQA: Benchmarking and Enhancing Multimodal LLMs on Comprehensive Mechanical Drawing Understanding
  4. 2024DesignQA: A Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models' Understanding of Engineering Documentation
  5. 2024Fault Diagnosis in Power Grids with Large Language Model
  6. 2026K-OPSD: Verifiable On-Policy Self-Distillation for Post-Training Vision-Language Models on AEC Drawings
  7. 2026Synthetic Defect Image Generation for Power Line Insulator Inspection Using Multimodal Large Language Models
  8. 2026Do VLMs Reason Like Engineers? A Benchmark and a Stage-wise Evaluation