mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Residual-PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Control Beyond the Gaussian Barrier

arXiv 2506.06530 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2025cs.CRcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) Privacy framework [46] provides a powerful instance-based methodology to preserve privacy in complex data-driven systems. Existing PAC Privacy algorithms (we call them Auto-PAC) rely on a Gaussian mutual information upper bound. However, we show that the upper bound obtained by these algorithms is tight if and only if the perturbed mechanism output is jointly Gaussian with independent Gaussian noise. We propose two approaches for addressing this issue. First, we introduce two tractable post-processing methods for Auto-PAC, based on Donsker-Varadhan representation and sliced Wasserstein distances. However, the result still leaves wasted privacy budget. To address this issue more fundamentally, we introduce Residual-PAC (R-PAC) Privacy, an f-divergence-based measure to quantify privacy that remains after adversarial inference. To implement R-PAC Privacy in practice, we propose a Stackelberg Residual-PAC (SR-PAC) privatization mechanism, a game-theoretic framework that selects optimal noise distributions through convex bilevel optimization. Our approach achieves efficient privacy budget utilization for arbitrary data distributions and naturally composes when multiple mechanisms access the dataset. Our experiments demonstrate that SR-PAC consistently obtains a better privacy-utility tradeoff than both PAC and differential privacy baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.