mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGD

arXiv 2601.10237 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.CRcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is the dominant paradigm for private training, but its fundamental limitations under worst-case adversarial privacy definitions remain poorly understood. We analyze DP-SGD in the f-differential privacy framework, which characterizes privacy via hypothesis-testing trade-off curves, and study shuffled sampling over a single epoch with M gradient updates. We derive an explicit suboptimal upper bound on the achievable trade-off curve. This result induces a geometric lower bound on the separation kappa, which is the maximum distance between the mechanism's trade-off curve and the ideal random-guessing line. Because a large separation implies significant adversarial advantage, meaningful privacy requires small kappa. However, we prove that enforcing a small separation imposes a strict lower bound on the Gaussian noise multiplier σ, which directly limits the achievable utility. In particular, under the standard worst-case adversarial model, shuffled DP-SGD must satisfy σ ≥ frac1√2ln M quadorquad kappa ≥ frac1√8!left(1-frac1√4πln Mright), thus cannot simultaneously achieve strong privacy and high utility. Although the noise threshold vanishes asymptotically as M → ∞, the convergence is extremely slow. Even for practically relevant numbers of updates the required noise magnitude remains substantial. We further show that the same limitation extends to Poisson subsampling up to constant factors. Our experiments confirm that the noise levels implied by this bound lead to significant accuracy degradation at realistic training settings, thus showing a bottleneck in DP-SGD under standard worst-case adversarial assumptions.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2026.

Builds on

52 of 74 references.

References · 52

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  6. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  7. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  8. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,425
  9. 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 607
  10. 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 526
  11. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
  12. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
38 more
  1. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
  2. 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
  3. 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
  4. 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 218
  5. 2019R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanismcited by 199
  6. 2021Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shufflingcited by 169
  7. 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 163
  8. 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
  9. 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 147
  10. 2022Differentially Private Diffusion Modelscited by 118
  11. 2020GS-WGAN: A Gradient-Sanitized Approach for Learning Differentially Private Generatorscited by 117
  12. 2021Large-Scale Differentially Private BERTcited by 117
  13. 2019Deep Learning with Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 112
  14. 2022Synthetic Text Generation with Differential Privacy: A Simple and Practical Recipecited by 108
  15. 2020Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by Shufflingcited by 96
  16. 2022Toward Training at ImageNet Scale with Differential Privacycited by 87
  17. 2021Optimal Accounting of Differential Privacy via Characteristic Functioncited by 83
  18. 2015Why Random Reshuffling Beats Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 78
  19. 2018Random Shuffling Beats SGD after Finite Epochscited by 66
  20. 2020A Unified Convergence Analysis for Shuffling-Type Gradient Methodscited by 57
  21. 2022Exploring the Limits of Differentially Private Deep Learning with Group-wise Clippingcited by 52
  22. 2022TAN Without a Burn: Scaling Laws of DP-SGDcited by 51
  23. 2024Private Fine-tuning of Large Language Models with Zeroth-order Optimizationcited by 41
  24. 2022Stronger Privacy Amplification by Shuffling for R'enyi and Approximate Differential Privacycited by 29
  25. 2017Convergence Analysis of Distributed Stochastic Gradient Descent with Shufflingcited by 23
  26. 2024How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?cited by 22
  27. 2025Scaling Laws for Differentially Private Language Modelscited by 22
  28. 2022PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Measurement and Control of Data Processingcited by 16
  29. 2024Scalable DP-SGD: Shuffling vs. Poisson Subsamplingcited by 16
  30. 2020Robustness Threats of Differential Privacycited by 15
  31. 2020Sharp Composition Bounds for Gaussian Differential Privacy via Edgeworth Expansioncited by 13
  32. 2021Gradient Masking and the Underestimated Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy in Deep Learningcited by 13
  33. 2023Unified Enhancement of Privacy Bounds for Mixture Mechanisms via f-Differential Privacycited by 13
  34. 2024Balls-and-Bins Sampling for DP-SGDcited by 13
  35. 2025Privacy amplification by random allocationcited by 13
  36. 2021Towards Understanding the Impact of Model Size on Differential Private Classificationcited by 10
  37. 2024Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent with Fixed-Size Minibatches: Tighter RDP Guarantees with or without Replacementcited by 7
  38. 2025Leveraging Randomness in Model and Data Partitioning for Privacy Amplificationcited by 7

50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.