mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Profiling German Text Simplification with Interpretable Model-Fingerprints

arXiv 2601.13050 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While Large Language Models (LLMs) produce highly nuanced text simplifications, developers currently lack tools for a holistic, efficient, and reproducible diagnosis of their behavior. This paper introduces the Simplification Profiler, a diagnostic toolkit that generates a multidimensional, interpretable fingerprint of simplified texts. Multiple aggregated simplifications of a model result in a model's fingerprint. This novel evaluation paradigm is particularly vital for languages, where the data scarcity problem is magnified when creating flexible models for diverse target groups rather than a single, fixed simplification style. We propose that measuring a model's unique behavioral signature is more relevant in this context as an alternative to correlating metrics with human preferences. We operationalize this with a practical meta-evaluation of our fingerprints' descriptive power, which bypasses the need for large, human-rated datasets. This test measures if a simple linear classifier can reliably identify various model configurations by their created simplifications, confirming that our metrics are sensitive to a model's specific characteristics. The Profiler can distinguish high-level behavioral variations between prompting strategies and fine-grained changes from prompt engineering, including few-shot examples. Our complete feature set achieves classification F1-scores up to 71.9 %, improving upon simple baselines by over 48 percentage points. The Simplification Profiler thus offers developers a granular, actionable analysis to build more effective and truly adaptive text simplification systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2026.

Builds on

22 of 34 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  2. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  3. 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
  4. 2020ASSET: A Dataset for Tuning and Evaluation of Sentence Simplification Models with Multiple Rewriting Transformationscited by 101
  5. 2018BLEU is Not Suitable for the Evaluation of Text Simplificationcited by 78
  6. 2019Controllable Sentence Simplificationcited by 78
  7. 2022LENS: A Learnable Evaluation Metric for Text Simplificationcited by 54
  8. 2019EASSE: Easier Automatic Sentence Simplification Evaluationcited by 50
  9. 2018Semantic Structural Evaluation for Text Simplificationcited by 30
  10. 2023Revisiting non-English Text Simplification: A Unified Multilingual Benchmarkcited by 27
  11. 2019Subjective Assessment of Text Complexity: A Dataset for German Languagecited by 17
  12. 2023Language Models for German Text Simplification: Overcoming Parallel Data Scarcity through Style-specific Pre-trainingcited by 15
10 more
  1. 2022A New Aligned Simple German Corpuscited by 10
  2. 2022Which Shortcut Solution Do Question Answering Models Prefer to Learn?cited by 9
  3. 2025Redefining Simplicity: Benchmarking Large Language Models from Lexical to Document Simplificationcited by 6
  4. 2023Which Spurious Correlations Impact Reasoning in NLI Models? A Visual Interactive Diagnosis through Data-Constrained Counterfactualscited by 4
  5. 2024German Text Simplification: Finetuning Large Language Models with Semi-Synthetic Datacited by 4
  6. 2024An In-depth Evaluation of Large Language Models in Sentence Simplification with Error-based Human Assessmentcited by 4
  7. 2025Evaluation Under Imperfect Benchmarks and Ratings: A Case Study in Text Simplificationcited by 4
  8. 2024Digital Comprehensibility Assessment of Simplified Texts among Persons with Intellectual Disabilitiescited by 3
  9. 2024REFeREE: A REference-FREE Model-Based Metric for Text Simplificationcited by 3
  10. 2023Explaining Relation Classification Models with Semantic Extentscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.