mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Left-Right Symmetry Breaking in CLIP-style Vision-Language Models Trained on Synthetic Spatial-Relation Data

arXiv 2601.12809 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Spatial understanding remains a key challenge in vision-language models. Yet it is still unclear whether such understanding is truly acquired, and if so, through what mechanisms. We present a controllable 1D image-text testbed to probe how left-right relational understanding emerges in Transformer-based vision and text encoders trained with a CLIP-style contrastive objective. We train lightweight Transformer-based vision and text encoders end-to-end on paired descriptions of one- and two-object scenes and evaluate generalization to unseen object pairs while systematically varying label and layout diversity. We find that contrastive training learns left-right relations and that label diversity, more than layout diversity, is the primary driver of generalization in this setting. To gain the mechanistic understanding, we perform an attention decomposition and show that interactions between positional and token embeddings induce a horizontal attention gradient that breaks left-right symmetry in the encoders; ablating this contribution substantially reduces left-right discrimination. Our results provide a mechanistic insight of when and how CLIP-style models acquire relational competence.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 46 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2026.

Builds on

46 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Vision-Language-Action (VLA) Models: Concepts, Progress, Applications and Challenges7 May
  2. 2025Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas3 Mar
  3. 2024GSR-BENCH: A Benchmark for Grounded Spatial Reasoning Evaluation via Multimodal LLMs19 Jun
  4. 2024SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models3 Jun
  5. 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities22 Jan
  6. 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning30 Oct

Other references · 40

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  4. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
  5. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  6. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  7. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
  8. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  9. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
  10. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
  11. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  12. 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 964
28 more
  1. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 735
  2. 2021SimVLM: Simple Visual Language Model Pretraining with Weak Supervisioncited by 647
  3. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
  4. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 627
  5. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
  6. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
  7. 2018A Corpus for Reasoning About Natural Language Grounded in Photographscited by 459
  8. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 436
  9. 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 243
  10. 2024Rotary Position Embedding for Vision Transformercited by 236
  11. 2022CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?cited by 181
  12. 2022A Survey of Vision-Language Pre-Trained Modelscited by 177
  13. 2021VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomenacited by 135
  14. 2024A Practical Review of Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-Based Language Modelscited by 118
  15. 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 102
  16. 2023Compositional Abilities Emerge Multiplicatively: Exploring Diffusion Models on a Synthetic Taskcited by 93
  17. 2024Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problemcited by 75
  18. 2025Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negationcited by 72
  19. 2024Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directionscited by 68
  20. 2023COLA: A Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-image Retrievalcited by 53
  21. 2024Recurrent Neural Networks Learn to Store and Generate Sequences using Non-Linear Representationscited by 47
  22. 2024Learn "No" to Say "Yes" Better: Improving Vision-Language Models via Negationscited by 46
  23. 2025Why Vision Language Models Struggle with Visual Arithmetic? Towards Enhanced Chart and Geometry Understandingcited by 24
  24. 2025Is CLIP ideal? No. Can we fix it? Yes!cited by 21
  25. 2024Iterated Learning Improves Compositionality in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 17
  26. 2025Does Data Scaling Lead to Visual Compositional Generalization?cited by 13
  27. 2024Do Pre-trained Vision-Language Models Encode Object States?cited by 7
  28. 2024Causal Graphical Models for Vision-Language Compositional Understandingcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023What's left can't be right -- The remaining positional incompetence of contrastive vision-language models
  2. 2025Investigating Spatial Attention Bias in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026The Spatial Blindspot of Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026Why Far Looks Up: Probing Spatial Representation in Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025LRR-Bench: Left, Right or Rotate? Vision-Language models Still Struggle With Spatial Understanding Tasks
  6. 2025Escaping Plato's Cave: JAM for Aligning Independently Trained Vision and Language Models
  7. 2026Nodes Are Early, Edges Are Late: Probing Diagram Representations in Large Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Object-centric Binding in Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining