Investigating Spatial Attention Bias in Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-Language Models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding visual content, yet systematic biases in their spatial processing remain largely unexplored. This work identifies and characterizes a systematic spatial attention bias where VLMs consistently prioritize describing left-positioned content before right-positioned content in horizontally concatenated images. Through controlled experiments on image pairs using both open-source and closed-source models, we demonstrate that this bias persists across different architectures, with models describing left-positioned content first in approximately 97% of cases under neutral prompting conditions. Testing on an Arabic-finetuned model reveals that the bias persists despite right-to-left language training, ruling out language reading direction as the primary cause. Investigation of training dataset annotation guidelines from PixMo and Visual Genome reveals no explicit left-first ordering instructions, suggesting the bias is consistent with architectural factors rather than explicit training data instructions. These findings reveal fundamental limitations in how current VLMs process spatial information.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 15 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2025.
Builds on
15 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond24 Aug
Other references · 14
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
- 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
- 2023LLaVA-Med: Training a Large Language-and-Vision Assistant for Biomedicine in One Daycited by 1,287
- 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,213
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 404
- 2019A Multiscale Visualization of Attention in the Transformer Modelcited by 292
- 2018Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Modelscited by 236
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026When Words Speak Louder than Images: Towards Understanding Language Bias in Vision-Language Models
- 2024See It from My Perspective: How Language Affects Cultural Bias in Image Understanding
- 2025Beyond Semantics: Rediscovering Spatial Awareness in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Why Far Looks Up: Probing Spatial Representation in Vision-Language Models
- 2025Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas
- 2025Mixed Signals: Decoding VLMs' Reasoning and Underlying Bias in Vision-Language Conflict
- 2026Language Bias in LVLMs: From In-Depth Analysis to Simple and Effective Mitigation
- 2026Anchored, Not Graded: Vision-Language Models Fail at Slant-from-Texture Perception