mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CTPD: Cross Tokenizer Preference Distillation

arXiv 2601.11865 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

While knowledge distillation has seen widespread use in pre-training and instruction tuning, its application to aligning language models with human preferences remains underexplored, particularly in the more realistic cross-tokenizer setting. The incompatibility of tokenization schemes between teacher and student models has largely prevented fine-grained, white-box distillation of preference information. To address this gap, we propose Cross-Tokenizer Preference Distillation (CTPD), the first unified framework for transferring human-aligned behavior between models with heterogeneous tokenizers. CTPD introduces three key innovations: (1) Aligned Span Projection, which maps teacher and student tokens to shared character-level spans for precise supervision transfer; (2) a cross-tokenizer adaptation of Token-level Importance Sampling (TIS-DPO) for improved credit assignment; and (3) a Teacher-Anchored Reference, allowing the student to directly leverage the teacher's preferences in a DPO-style objective. Our theoretical analysis grounds CTPD in importance sampling, and experiments across multiple benchmarks confirm its effectiveness, with significant performance gains over existing methods. These results establish CTPD as a practical and general solution for preference distillation across diverse tokenization schemes, opening the door to more accessible and efficient alignment of language models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 13 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2026.

Builds on

13 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024TIS-DPO: Token-level Importance Sampling for Direct Preference Optimization With Estimated Weights6 Oct
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 11

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  6. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  7. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  9. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 710
  10. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  11. 2024Multi-Level Optimal Transport for Universal Cross-Tokenizer Knowledge Distillation on Language Modelscited by 35

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Capturing Nuanced Preferences: Preference-Aligned Distillation for Small Language Models
  2. 2025Advantage-Guided Distillation for Preference Alignment in Small Language Models
  3. 2026Rethinking Cross-Tokenizer On-Policy Distillation: From Alignment Coverage to Supervision Reliability
  4. 2026ACTD: Anchor-Based Cross-Tokenizer Distillation with Residual Regularization
  5. 2024A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following
  6. 2025Optimal Transport-Based Token Weighting scheme for Enhanced Preference Optimization
  7. 2024Aligning Language Models with Demonstrated Feedback
  8. 2025AlignDistil: Token-Level Language Model Alignment as Adaptive Policy Distillation