CoVar: Confidence-Variance-Guided Pseudo-Label Selection for Semi-Supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pseudo-label selection in semi-supervised learning is commonly driven by maximum-confidence thresholds, yet confidence alone can be unreliable under model overconfidence and class imbalance. We propose CoVar, a confidence--variance framework that assesses pseudo-label reliability by jointly modeling Maximum Confidence (MC) and Residual-Class Variance (RCV). Starting from entropy minimization, we derive a second-order cross-entropy approximation showing that low-loss pseudo-labels are favored when MC is high and RCV is low, with a confidence-dependent penalty that becomes stronger for near-certain predictions. Based on this criterion, CoVar embeds predictions into a two-dimensional confidence--variance space and uses SVD-based spectral relaxation to separate reliable and unreliable predictions without hand-tuned confidence thresholds. Cluster-wise Gaussian weighting then converts this separation into per-sample training weights. The resulting weights can be integrated into existing semi-supervised segmentation and classification pipelines during training and introduce no inference-time overhead. Experiments on PASCAL VOC 2012, Cityscapes, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, SVHN, and STL-10 show clear gains on VOC and Cityscapes under matched backbones, as well as competitive or improved error rates on standard classification benchmarks. These results indicate that residual-class dispersion provides a useful signal complementary to confidence for robust pseudo-label selection.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2026.
Builds on
40 of 60 references.
References · 40
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
- 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
- 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 540
- 2021Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Cross Pseudo Supervisioncited by 463
- 2020Rethinking Pre-training and Self-trainingcited by 352
28 more
- 2019ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoringcited by 349
- 2021In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 301
- 2022FreeMatch: Self-adaptive Thresholding for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 232
- 2022Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation Using Unreliable Pseudo-Labelscited by 218
- 2021ST++: Make Self-training Work Better for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 184
- 2022Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 178
- 2022MIC: Masked Image Consistency for Context-Enhanced Domain Adaptationcited by 178
- 2021Perturbed and Strict Mean Teachers for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 113
- 2021Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentation with Directional Context-aware Consistencycited by 112
- 2021Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation via Adaptive Equalization Learningcited by 101
- 2022USB: A Unified Semi-supervised Learning Benchmark for Classificationcited by 95
- 2021Re-distributing Biased Pseudo Labels for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentation: A Baseline Investigationcited by 78
- 2021SimPLE: Similar Pseudo Label Exploitation for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 68
- 2022Augmentation Matters: A Simple-yet-Effective Approach to Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 64
- 2022Debiased Self-Training for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 62
- 2024UniMatch V2: Pushing the Limit of Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 54
- 2023CorrMatch: Label Propagation via Correlation Matching for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 44
- 2020Transferable Calibration with Lower Bias and Variance in Domain Adaptationcited by 41
- 2023SemiVL: Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Vision-Language Guidancecited by 41
- 2023Conflict-Based Cross-View Consistency for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 35
- 2024AllSpark: Reborn Labeled Features from Unlabeled in Transformer for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 35
- 2023Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation via Gentle Teaching Assistantcited by 34
- 2023Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning by Exploiting All Unlabeled Datacited by 26
- 2022ConMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Confidence-Guided Consistency Regularizationcited by 25
- 2022Fuzzy Positive Learning for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 19
- 2024Towards the Uncharted: Density-Descending Feature Perturbation for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 16
- 2023SemiReward: A General Reward Model for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 14
- 2025CGMatch: A Different Perspective of Semi-supervised Learningcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.