mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

EvoMorph: Counterfactual Explanations for Continuous Time-Series Extrinsic Regression Applied to Photoplethysmography

arXiv 2601.10356 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Wearable devices enable continuous, population-scale monitoring of physiological signals, such as photoplethysmography (PPG), creating new opportunities for data-driven clinical assessment. Time-series extrinsic regression (TSER) models increasingly leverage PPG signals to estimate clinically relevant outcomes, including heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation. For clinical reasoning and trust, however, single point estimates alone are insufficient: clinicians must also understand whether predictions are stable under physiologically plausible variations and to what extent realistic, attainable changes in physiological signals would meaningfully alter a model's prediction. Counterfactual explanations (CFE) address these "what-if" questions, yet existing time series CFE generation methods are largely restricted to classification, overlook waveform morphology, and often produce physiologically implausible signals, limiting their applicability to continuous biomedical time series. To address these limitations, we introduce EvoMorph, a multi-objective evolutionary framework for generating physiologically plausible and diverse CFE for TSER applications. EvoMorph optimizes morphology-aware objectives defined on interpretable signal descriptors and applies transformations to preserve the waveform structure. We evaluated EvoMorph on three PPG datasets (heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation) against a nearest-unlike-neighbor baseline. In addition, in a case study, we evaluated EvoMorph as a tool for uncertainty quantification by relating counterfactual sensitivity to bootstrap-ensemble uncertainty and data-density measures. Overall, EvoMorph enables the generation of physiologically-aware counterfactuals for continuous biomedical signals and supports uncertainty-aware interpretability, advancing trustworthy model analysis for clinical time-series applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2026.

Builds on

14 of 39 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  4. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  5. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
  6. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 233
  7. 2019Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Consequential Decisionscited by 204
  8. 2020Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanationscited by 157
  9. 2020Getting a CLUE: A Method for Explaining Uncertainty Estimatescited by 92
  10. 2020GANterfactual - Counterfactual Explanations for Medical Non-Experts using Generative Adversarial Learningcited by 50
  11. 2023Self-Interpretable Time Series Prediction with Counterfactual Explanationscited by 24
  12. 2024Counterfactual Explanations for Medical Image Classification and Regression using Diffusion Autoencodercited by 10
2 more
  1. 2023Beyond Known Reality: Exploiting Counterfactual Explanations for Medical Researchcited by 9
  2. 2018Explainable time series tweaking via irreversible and reversible temporal transformationscited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.