mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy

arXiv 2012.07828 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2020cs.LG cs.CRcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differential privacy (DP) is a gold-standard concept of measuring and guaranteeing privacy in data analysis. It is well-known that the cost of adding DP to deep learning model is its accuracy. However, it remains unclear how it affects robustness of the model. Standard neural networks are not robust to different input perturbations: either adversarial attacks or common corruptions. In this paper, we empirically observe an interesting trade-off between privacy and robustness of neural networks. We experimentally demonstrate that networks, trained with DP, in some settings might be even more vulnerable in comparison to non-private versions. To explore this, we extensively study different robustness measurements, including FGSM and PGD adversaries, distance to linear decision boundaries, curvature profile, and performance on a corrupted dataset. Finally, we study how the main ingredients of differentially private neural networks training, such as gradient clipping and noise addition, affect (decrease and increase) the robustness of the model.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

15 papers.

Sort: