Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent with Fixed-Size Minibatches: Tighter RDP Guarantees with or without Replacement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) has been instrumental in privately training deep learning models by providing a framework to control and track the privacy loss incurred during training. At the core of this computation lies a subsampling method that uses a privacy amplification lemma to enhance the privacy guarantees provided by the additive noise. Fixed size subsampling is appealing for its constant memory usage, unlike the variable sized minibatches in Poisson subsampling. It is also of interest in addressing class imbalance and federated learning. However, the current computable guarantees for fixed-size subsampling are not tight and do not consider both add/remove and replace-one adjacency relationships. We present a new and holistic R'enyi differential privacy (RDP) accountant for DP-SGD with fixed-size subsampling without replacement (FSwoR) and with replacement (FSwR). For FSwoR we consider both add/remove and replace-one adjacency. Our FSwoR results improves on the best current computable bound by a factor of 4. We also show for the first time that the widely-used Poisson subsampling and FSwoR with replace-one adjacency have the same privacy to leading order in the sampling probability. Accordingly, our work suggests that FSwoR is often preferable to Poisson subsampling due to constant memory usage. Our FSwR accountant includes explicit non-asymptotic upper and lower bounds and, to the authors' knowledge, is the first such analysis of fixed-size RDP with replacement for DP-SGD. We analytically and empirically compare fixed size and Poisson subsampling, and show that DP-SGD gradients in a fixed-size subsampling regime exhibit lower variance in practice in addition to memory usage benefits.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2024.
Builds on
10 of 24 references.
References · 10
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
- 2019R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanismcited by 199
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 139
- 2019Hypothesis Testing Interpretations and Renyi Differential Privacycited by 84
- 2021Optimal Accounting of Differential Privacy via Characteristic Functioncited by 83
- 2023Bounding Training Data Reconstruction in DP-SGDcited by 42
- 2024Avoiding Pitfalls for Privacy Accounting of Subsampled Mechanisms under Compositioncited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2026Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGDcited by 4
- 2025FLOSS: Federated Learning with Opt-Out and Straggler Supportcited by 1
- 2026WinFLoRA: Incentivizing Client-Adaptive Aggregation in Federated LoRA under Privacy Heterogeneitycited by 1
- 2026A Robust Framework for Secure Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: An Architectural Case Study of Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2026Trade-off Functions for DP-SGD with Subsampling based on Random Allocation: Tight Upper and Lower Boundscited by 1
- 2025An Interactive Framework for Implementing Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning: Experiments on Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Continual Learning With Participation Privacy: An Auditable Buffering-Aggregation Recipecited by 0
- 2026Continual Learning With Participation Privacy: An Auditable Buffering-Aggregation Recipe8 Jul 2026
- 2026Trade-off Functions for DP-SGD with Subsampling based on Random Allocation: Tight Upper and Lower Bounds7 May 2026
- 2026A Robust Framework for Secure Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: An Architectural Case Study of Differentially Private Federated Learning28 Feb 2026
- 2026WinFLoRA: Incentivizing Client-Adaptive Aggregation in Federated LoRA under Privacy Heterogeneity1 Feb 2026
- 2026Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGD15 Jan 2026
- 2025FLOSS: Federated Learning with Opt-Out and Straggler Support30 Jul 2025
- 2025An Interactive Framework for Implementing Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning: Experiments on Large Language Models11 Feb 2025