mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dual-Level Models for Physics-Informed Multi-Step Time Series Forecasting

arXiv 2601.07640 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper develops an approach for multi-step forecasting of dynamical systems by integrating probabilistic input forecasting with physics-informed output prediction. Accurate multi-step forecasting of time series systems is important for the automatic control and optimization of physical processes, enabling more precise decision-making. While mechanistic-based and data-driven machine learning (ML) approaches have been employed for time series forecasting, they face significant limitations. Incomplete knowledge of process mathematical models limits mechanistic-based direct employment, while purely data-driven ML models struggle with dynamic environments, leading to poor generalization. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a dual-level strategy for physics-informed forecasting of dynamical systems. On the first level, input variables are forecast using a hybrid method that integrates a long short-term memory (LSTM) network into probabilistic state transition models (STMs). On the second level, these stochastically predicted inputs are sequentially fed into a physics-informed neural network (PINN) to generate multi-step output predictions. The experimental results of the paper demonstrate that the hybrid input forecasting models achieve a higher log-likelihood and lower mean squared errors (MSE) compared to conventional STMs. Furthermore, the PINNs driven by the input forecasting models outperform their purely data-driven counterparts in terms of MSE and log-likelihood, exhibiting stronger generalization and forecasting performance across multiple test cases.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2026.

Builds on

11 of 49 references.

References · 11

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,141
  3. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
  4. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
  5. 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 362
  6. 2017Hidden Physics Models: Machine Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 208
  7. 2020Integrating Scientific Knowledge with Machine Learning for Engineering and Environmental Systemscited by 160
  8. 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part II): Data-driven Discovery of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 158
  9. 2020Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: Tutorial and Literature Surveycited by 117
  10. 2023Physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse problems in complex beam systemscited by 24
  11. 2024Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Grade Prediction in Froth Flotationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.