mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Binary: Turning Partial Success into Dense Verifiable Rewards for Reinforcement Learning in Code Generation

arXiv 2601.03525 ↗First posted 7 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Effective reward design is a central challenge in Reinforcement Learning (RL) for code generation. Mainstream test-suite-level outcome rewards enforce functional correctness but induce sparsity, while external Reward Models (RMs) provide dense supervision at the cost of misalignment and additional overhead. Since code evaluation naturally yields multiple test-case-level outcomes, partial success, i.e., passing a subset of test cases, offers an intrinsic, verifiable source of dense supervision. In this paper, we propose VeRPO (Verifiable Dense Reward Policy Optimization), an RL framework that systematically turns verifiable partial success into reliable dense rewards. We analyze partial-success rewards using a weighted sum formulation, theoretically identifying a critical cardinality bias that causes policy updates to disproportionately favor gains from easy-test successes over progress on frontier tests. Based on this, VeRPO introduces a dynamic, density-calibrated local reward that explicitly corrects this bias and provides robust dense supervision from partial success. To enhance alignment with end-to-end functional correctness, VeRPO further integrates the local dense reward with global execution outcomes. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks and settings demonstrate that VeRPO outperforms outcome-driven and RM-based baselines, achieving up to +8.83 pass@1 gain with negligible time cost (< 0.02%) and zero GPU memory overhead.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2026.

Builds on

22 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025The Policy Cliff: A Theoretical Analysis of Reward-Policy Maps in Large Language Models27 Jul
  2. 2025ACECODER: Acing Coder RL via Automated Test-Case Synthesis3 Feb

Other references · 20

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  3. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  4. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  5. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,427
  6. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  7. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
  8. 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 890
  9. 2025Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Trainingcited by 442
  10. 2024OpenCodeInterpreter: Integrating Code Generation with Execution and Refinementcited by 242
  11. 2023TACO: Topics in Algorithmic COde generation datasetcited by 150
  12. 2024RLEF: Grounding Code LLMs in Execution Feedback with Reinforcement Learningcited by 146
8 more
  1. 2023RLTF: Reinforcement Learning from Unit Test Feedbackcited by 110
  2. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards: GRPO's Effective Loss, Dynamics, and Success Amplificationcited by 108
  3. 2025A Survey on Code Generation with LLM-based Agentscited by 104
  4. 2025LeetCodeDataset: A Temporal Dataset for Robust Evaluation and Efficient Training of Code LLMscited by 67
  5. 2025Chasing the Tail: Effective Rubric-based Reward Modeling for Large Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 46
  6. 2024A Large Language Model-Driven Reward Design Framework via Dynamic Feedback for Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
  7. 2024Process Supervision-Guided Policy Optimization for Code Generationcited by 25
  8. 2025Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Code Generationcited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Improving Small Language Models for Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from Verification Feedback
  2. 2026When Do Intrinsic Rewards Work for Code Reasoning? A Comprehensive Study
  3. 2026Exploring Pass-Rate Reward in Reinforcement Learning for Code Generation
  4. 2026Verifiable Process Rewards for Agentic Reasoning
  5. 2026Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation
  6. 2026CodeScaler: Scaling Code LLM Training and Test-Time Inference via Reward Models
  7. 2026Reinforcement Learning for Code Optimization
  8. 2025ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs