mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AmPLe: Supporting Vision-Language Models via Adaptive-Debiased Ensemble Multi-Prompt Learning

arXiv 2512.18411 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-prompt learning methods have emerged as an effective approach for facilitating the rapid adaptation of vision-language models to downstream tasks with limited resources. Existing multi-prompt learning methods primarily focus on utilizing various meticulously designed prompts within a single foundation vision-language model to achieve superior performance. However, the overlooked model-prompt matching bias hinders the development of multi-prompt learning, i.e., the same prompt can convey different semantics across distinct vision-language models, such as CLIP-ViT-B/16 and CLIP-ViT-B/32, resulting in inconsistent predictions of identical prompt. To mitigate the impact of this bias on downstream tasks, we explore an ensemble learning approach to sufficiently aggregate the benefits of diverse predictions. Additionally, we further disclose the presence of sample-prompt matching bias, which originates from the prompt-irrelevant semantics encapsulated in the input samples. Thus, directly utilizing all information from the input samples for generating weights of ensemble learning can lead to suboptimal performance. In response, we extract prompt-relevant semantics from input samples by leveraging the guidance of the information theory-based analysis, adaptively calculating debiased ensemble weights. Overall, we propose Adaptive-Debiased Ensemble MultiPrompt Learning, abbreviated as AmPLe, to mitigate the two types of bias simultaneously. Extensive experiments on three representative tasks, i.e., generalization to novel classes, new target datasets, and unseen domain shifts, show that AmPLe can widely outperform existing methods. Theoretical validation from a causal perspective further supports the effectiveness of AmPLe.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 41 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2025.

Builds on

41 of 87 references.

Closest ancestors · 14

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025A Retrospect to Multi-prompt Learning across Vision and Language31 Oct
  2. 2024IPO: Interpretable Prompt Optimization for Vision-Language Models20 Oct
  3. 2024Cascade Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Model Adaptation26 Sep
  4. 2024Meta-Prompting for Automating Zero-shot Visual Recognition with LLMs18 Mar
  5. 2023Prompt-based Distribution Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation15 Dec
  6. 2023ArGue: Attribute-Guided Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models27 Nov
  7. 2023Active Prompt Learning in Vision Language Models18 Nov
  8. 2023Context-Aware Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Model with Dual-Alignment8 Sep
  9. 2023Waffling around for Performance: Visual Classification with Random Words and Broad Concepts12 Jun
  10. 2022Learning Domain Invariant Prompt for Vision-Language Models8 Dec
  11. 2022Visual Classification via Description from Large Language Models13 Oct
  12. 2022Prompt Distribution Learning6 May
2 more
  1. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
  2. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep

Other references · 27

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  6. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  7. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  8. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  9. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  10. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  11. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  12. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
15 more
  1. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  2. 2021Supervision Exists Everywhere: A Data Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training Paradigmcited by 405
  3. 2023Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 272
  4. 2013Zero-Shot Learning Through Cross-Modal Transfercited by 237
  5. 2024PIVOT: Iterative Visual Prompting Elicits Actionable Knowledge for VLMscited by 187
  6. 2023Large Language Models are Visual Reasoning Coordinatorscited by 58
  7. 2017Self-supervised learning of visual features through embedding images into text topic spacescited by 43
  8. 2025MMRL: Multi-Modal Representation Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 38
  9. 2022Invariant and Transportable Representations for Anti-Causal Domain Shiftscited by 37
  10. 2023Progressive Visual Prompt Learning with Contrastive Feature Re-formationcited by 35
  11. 2024CityLLaVA: Efficient Fine-Tuning for VLMs in City Scenariocited by 27
  12. 2023Learning Domain-Aware Detection Head with Prompt Tuningcited by 18
  13. 2023Revisiting Deep Ensemble for Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 10
  14. 2025DiMPLe -- Disentangled Multi-Modal Prompt Learning: Enhancing Out-Of-Distribution Alignment with Invariant and Spurious Feature Separationcited by 5
  15. 2025AttriPrompt: Dynamic Prompt Composition Learning for CLIPcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Retaining and Enhancing Pre-trained Knowledge in Vision-Language Models with Prompt Ensembling
  2. 2024A Lost Opportunity for Vision-Language Models: A Comparative Study of Online Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025Cluster-Aware Prompt Ensemble Learning for Few-Shot Vision-Language Model Adaptation
  4. 2025Prompt-OT: An Optimal Transport Regularization Paradigm for Knowledge Preservation in Vision-Language Model Adaptation
  5. 2023Towards Difficulty-Agnostic Efficient Transfer Learning for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Revisiting Prompt Pretraining of Vision-Language Models
  7. 2022Multitask Vision-Language Prompt Tuning
  8. 2026BiPrompt: Bilateral Prompt Optimization for Visual and Textual Debiasing in Vision-Language Models