Sigmoid Head for Quality Estimation under Language Ambiguity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language model (LM) probability is not a reliable quality estimator, as natural language is ambiguous. When multiple output options are valid, the model's probability distribution is spread across them, which can misleadingly indicate low output quality. This issue is caused by two reasons: (1) LMs' final output activation is softmax, which does not allow multiple correct options to receive high probabilities simultaneuously and (2) LMs' training data is single, one-hot encoded references, indicating that there is only one correct option at each output step. We propose training a module for Quality Estimation on top of pre-trained LMs to address these limitations. The module, called Sigmoid Head, is an extra unembedding head with sigmoid activation to tackle the first limitation. To tackle the second limitation, during the negative sampling process to train the Sigmoid Head, we use a heuristic to avoid selecting potentially alternative correct tokens. Our Sigmoid Head is computationally efficient during training and inference. The probability from Sigmoid Head is notably better quality signal compared to the original softmax head. As the Sigmoid Head does not rely on human-annotated quality data, it is more robust to out-of-domain settings compared to supervised QE.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2026.
Builds on
23 of 41 references.
References · 23
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2019PAWS-X: A Cross-lingual Adversarial Dataset for Paraphrase Identificationcited by 262
- 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 260
- 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 210
- 2017Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representationscited by 207
- 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 205
- 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 205
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Modelscited by 193
11 more
- 2024Fact-Checking the Output of Large Language Models via Token-Level Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 159
- 2023LM-Polygraph: Uncertainty Estimation for Language Modelscited by 130
- 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
- 2024A New Massive Multilingual Dataset for High-Performance Language Technologiescited by 56
- 2021DeltaLM: Encoder-Decoder Pre-training for Language Generation and Translation by Augmenting Pretrained Multilingual Encoderscited by 50
- 2024Fine-Tuned Machine Translation Metrics Struggle in Unseen Domainscited by 21
- 2022Jam or Cream First? Modeling Ambiguity in Neural Machine Translation with SCONEScited by 10
- 2023Perturbation-based QE: An Explainable, Unsupervised Word-level Quality Estimation Method for Blackbox Machine Translationcited by 6
- 2025Are Generative Models Underconfident? Better Quality Estimation with Boosted Model Probabilitycited by 4
- 2025Improving the Calibration of Confidence Scores in Text Generation Using the Output Distribution's Characteristicscited by 4
- 2024Quality Estimation with k-nearest Neighbors and Automatic Evaluation for Model-specific Quality Estimationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.