mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Perturbation-based QE: An Explainable, Unsupervised Word-level Quality Estimation Method for Blackbox Machine Translation

arXiv 2305.07457 ↗First posted 12 May 2023cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quality Estimation (QE) is the task of predicting the quality of Machine Translation (MT) system output, without using any gold-standard translation references. State-of-the-art QE models are supervised: they require human-labeled quality of some MT system output on some datasets for training, making them domain-dependent and MT-system-dependent. There has been research on unsupervised QE, which requires glass-box access to the MT systems, or parallel MT data to generate synthetic errors for training QE models. In this paper, we present Perturbation-based QE - a word-level Quality Estimation approach that works simply by analyzing MT system output on perturbed input source sentences. Our approach is unsupervised, explainable, and can evaluate any type of blackbox MT systems, including the currently prominent large language models (LLMs) with opaque internal processes. For language directions with no labeled QE data, our approach has similar or better performance than the zero-shot supervised approach on the WMT21 shared task. Our approach is better at detecting gender bias and word-sense-disambiguation errors in translation than supervised QE, indicating its robustness to out-of-domain usage. The performance gap is larger when detecting errors on a nontraditional translation-prompting LLM, indicating that our approach is more generalizable to different MT systems. We give examples demonstrating our approach's explainability power, where it shows which input source words have influence on a certain MT output word.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2023.

Builds on

22 of 34 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  6. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  7. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  8. 2020Multilingual Translation with Extensible Multilingual Pretraining and Finetuningcited by 287
  9. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 247
  10. 2023Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 247
  11. 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 210
  12. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 205
10 more
  1. 2022Prompting PaLM for Translation: Assessing Strategies and Performancecited by 144
  2. 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 116
  3. 2023Investigating the Translation Performance of a Large Multilingual Language Model: the Case of BLOOMcited by 58
  4. 2020MLQE-PE: A Multilingual Quality Estimation and Post-Editing Datasetcited by 47
  5. 2022Towards Opening the Black Box of Neural Machine Translation: Source and Target Interpretations of the Transformercited by 45
  6. 2021The Eval4NLP Shared Task on Explainable Quality Estimation: Overview and Resultscited by 27
  7. 2019Towards Understanding Neural Machine Translation with Word Importancecited by 19
  8. 2021Quality Estimation without Human-labeled Datacited by 15
  9. 2022Better Quality Estimation for Low Resource Corpus Miningcited by 8
  10. 2019Modeling Confidence in Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

6 papers.