mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Jam or Cream First? Modeling Ambiguity in Neural Machine Translation with SCONES

arXiv 2205.00704 ↗First posted 2 May 2022cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The softmax layer in neural machine translation is designed to model the distribution over mutually exclusive tokens. Machine translation, however, is intrinsically uncertain: the same source sentence can have multiple semantically equivalent translations. Therefore, we propose to replace the softmax activation with a multi-label classification layer that can model ambiguity more effectively. We call our loss function Single-label Contrastive Objective for Non-Exclusive Sequences (SCONES). We show that the multi-label output layer can still be trained on single reference training data using the SCONES loss function. SCONES yields consistent BLEU score gains across six translation directions, particularly for medium-resource language pairs and small beam sizes. By using smaller beam sizes we can speed up inference by a factor of 3.9x and still match or improve the BLEU score obtained using softmax. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SCONES can be used to train NMT models that assign the highest probability to adequate translations, thus mitigating the "beam search curse". Additional experiments on synthetic language pairs with varying levels of uncertainty suggest that the improvements from SCONES can be attributed to better handling of ambiguity.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2022.

Builds on

18 of 42 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  3. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  4. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  5. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  6. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  7. 2019Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutescited by 674
  8. 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 335
  9. 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 138
  10. 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
  11. 2018Correcting Length Bias in Neural Machine Translationcited by 120
  12. 2019On NMT Search Errors and Model Errors: Cat Got Your Tongue?cited by 114
6 more
  1. 2018SGM: Sequence Generation Model for Multi-label Classificationcited by 89
  2. 2019Calibration of Encoder Decoder Models for Neural Machine Translationcited by 68
  3. 2016Length bias in Encoder Decoder Models and a Case for Global Conditioningcited by 14
  4. 2018Bag-of-Words as Target for Neural Machine Translationcited by 11
  5. 2022Uncertainty Determines the Adequacy of the Mode and the Tractability of Decoding in Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 9
  6. 2018Self-Normalization Properties of Language Modelingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

10 papers.