mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PrivUn: Unveiling Latent Ripple Effects and Shallow Forgetting in Privacy Unlearning

arXiv 2604.22076 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) often memorize private information during training, raising serious privacy concerns. While machine unlearning has emerged as a promising solution, its true effectiveness against privacy attacks remains unclear. To address this, we propose PrivUn, a new evaluation framework that systematically assesses unlearning robustness through three-tier attack scenarios: direct retrieval, in-context learning recovery, and fine-tuning restoration; combined with quantitative analysis using forgetting scores, association metrics, and forgetting depth assessment. Our study exposes significant weaknesses in current unlearning methods, revealing two key findings: 1) unlearning exhibits gradient-driven ripple effects: unlike traditional forgetting which follows semantic relations (e.g., knowledge graphs), privacy unlearning propagates across latent gradient-based associations; and 2) most methods suffer from shallow forgetting, failing to remove private information distributed across multiple deep model layers. To validate these insights, we explore two strategies: association-aware core-set selection that leverages gradient similarity, and multi-layer deep intervention through representational constraints. These strategies represent a paradigm shift from shallow forgetting to deep forgetting.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 22 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

Builds on

22 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Do LLMs Really Forget? Evaluating Unlearning with Knowledge Correlation and Confidence Awareness6 Jun
  2. 2025Towards LLM Unlearning Resilient to Relearning Attacks: A Sharpness-Aware Minimization Perspective and Beyond7 Feb
  3. 2024Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization21 Oct
  4. 2024MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models8 Jul
  5. 2024UnUnlearning: Unlearning is not sufficient for content regulation in advanced generative AI27 Jun
  6. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
  7. 2024Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMs26 Feb
  8. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  9. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs3 Oct
  10. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct

Other references · 12

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  3. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  5. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  6. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
  7. 2023Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language Modelscited by 278
  8. 2023Evaluating the Ripple Effects of Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 238
  9. 2022Are Large Pre-Trained Language Models Leaking Your Personal Information?cited by 195
  10. 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 158
  11. 2025Model Tampering Attacks Enable More Rigorous Evaluations of LLM Capabilitiescited by 36
  12. 2023The Janus Interface: How Fine-Tuning in Large Language Models Amplifies the Privacy Riskscited by 35

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.