Keypoint Counting Classifiers: Turning Vision Transformers into Self-Explainable Models Without Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current approaches for designing self-explainable models (SEMs) require complicated training procedures and specific architectures which makes them impractical. With the advance of general purpose foundation models based on Vision Transformers (ViTs), this impracticability becomes even more problematic. Therefore, new methods are necessary to provide transparency and reliability to ViT-based foundation models. In this work, we present a new method for turning any well-trained ViT-based model into a SEM without retraining, which we call Keypoint Counting Classifiers (KCCs). Recent works have shown that ViTs can automatically identify matching keypoints between images with high precision, and we build on these results to create an easily interpretable decision process that is inherently visualizable in the input. We perform an extensive evaluation which show that KCCs improve the human-machine communication compared to recent baselines. We believe that KCCs constitute an important step towards making ViT-based foundation models more transparent and reliable.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2025.
Builds on
24 of 36 references.
References · 24
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
- 2020A Survey on Visual Transformercited by 654
- 2021Deep ViT Features as Dense Visual Descriptorscited by 330
- 2020Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-grained Image Recognitioncited by 214
- 2022The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 159
- 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directionscited by 125
- 2021Deformable ProtoPNet: An Interpretable Image Classifier Using Deformable Prototypescited by 120
- 2021HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanationscited by 105
- 2021Interpretable Image Classification with Differentiable Prototypes Assignmentcited by 97
12 more
- 2021This Looks Like That... Does it? Shortcomings of Latent Space Prototype Interpretability in Deep Networkscited by 65
- 2022"Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interactioncited by 63
- 2023Going Denser with Open-Vocabulary Part Segmentationcited by 51
- 2023Learning Support and Trivial Prototypes for Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 38
- 2022ProtoVAE: A Trustworthy Self-Explainable Prototypical Variational Modelcited by 34
- 2023Pixel-Grounded Prototypical Part Networkscited by 18
- 2016Best-Buddies Similarity - Robust Template Matching using Mutual Nearest Neighborscited by 12
- 2025Explain Yourself, Briefly! Self-Explaining Neural Networks with Concise Sufficient Reasonscited by 12
- 2023On the Interpretability of Part-Prototype Based Classifiers: A Human Centric Analysiscited by 11
- 2024PDiscoFormer: Relaxing Part Discovery Constraints with Vision Transformerscited by 9
- 2023Prototypical Self-Explainable Models Without Re-trainingcited by 6
- 2024Why do explanations fail? A typology and discussion on failures in XAIcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.