mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisiting dequantization and quantum advantage in learning tasks

arXiv 2112.00811 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2021quant-ph cs.IT cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It has been shown that the apparent advantage of some quantum machine learning algorithms may be efficiently replicated using classical algorithms with suitable data access -- a process known as dequantization. Existing works on dequantization compare quantum algorithms which take copies of an n-qubit quantum state |xrangle = sumi xi |irangle as input to classical algorithms which have sample and query (SQ) access to the vector x. In this note, we prove that classical algorithms with SQ access can accomplish some learning tasks exponentially faster than quantum algorithms with quantum state inputs. Because classical algorithms are a subset of quantum algorithms, this demonstrates that SQ access can sometimes be significantly more powerful than quantum state inputs. Our findings suggest that the absence of exponential quantum advantage in some learning tasks may be due to SQ access being too powerful relative to quantum state inputs. If we compare quantum algorithms with quantum state inputs to classical algorithms with access to measurement data on quantum states, the landscape of quantum advantage can be dramatically different. We remark that when the quantum states are constructed from exponential-size classical data, comparing SQ access and quantum state inputs is appropriate since both require exponential time to prepare.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2021.

Builds on

6 of 16 references.

References · 6

  1. 2021Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learningcited by 96
  2. 2021Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problemscited by 91
  3. 2018A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systemscited by 70
  4. 2021Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memorycited by 52
  5. 2019Sampling-based sublinear low-rank matrix arithmetic framework for dequantizing quantum machine learningcited by 37
  6. 2018Quantum-inspired low-rank stochastic regression with logarithmic dependence on the dimensioncited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Exponential quantum advantage in processing massive classical data
  2. 2025Prospects for quantum advantage in machine learning from the representability of functions
  3. 2023Classical Verification of Quantum Learning
  4. 2026Towards Surrogate Based Dequantization of Quantum Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026A Quantum-Inspired Dequantization Method for Diagonally Weighted Matrix Functions: Application to Learning with Optimized Random Features
  6. 2024Digital-Analog Quantum Machine Learning
  7. 2025Quantum Data Encoding and Variational Algorithms: A Framework for Hybrid Quantum Classical Machine Learning
  8. 2026Quantum vs. Classical Machine Learning: A Unified Empirical Comparison