mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Superior resilience to poisoning and amenability to unlearning in quantum machine learning

arXiv 2508.02422 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2025quant-ph cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

The reliability of artificial intelligence hinges on the integrity of its training data, a foundation often compromised by noise and corruption. Here, through a comparative study of classical and quantum neural networks on both classical and quantum data, we reveal a fundamental difference in their response to data corruption. We find that classical models exhibit brittle memorization, leading to a failure in generalization. In contrast, quantum models demonstrate remarkable resilience, which is underscored by a phase transition-like response to increasing label noise, revealing a critical point beyond which the model's performance changes qualitatively. We further establish and investigate the field of quantum machine unlearning, the process of efficiently forcing a trained model to forget corrupting influences. We show that the brittle nature of the classical model forms rigid, stubborn memories of erroneous data, making efficient unlearning challenging, while the quantum model is significantly more amenable to efficient forgetting with approximate unlearning methods. Our findings establish that quantum machine learning can possess a dual advantage of intrinsic resilience and efficient adaptability, providing a promising paradigm for the trustworthy and robust artificial intelligence of the future.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 46 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2025.

Builds on

46 of 82 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Machine Unlearning: A Comprehensive Survey13 May
  2. 2024nabla τ: Gradient-based and Task-Agnostic machine Unlearning21 Mar
  3. 2024Corrective Machine Unlearning21 Feb
  4. 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models13 Feb
  5. 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning20 Feb
  6. 2022Towards Adversarial Evaluations for Inexact Machine Unlearning17 Jan

Other references · 40

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  4. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  5. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  6. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  7. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
  8. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  9. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
  10. 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 624
  11. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
  12. 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
28 more
  1. 2019Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning modelscited by 330
  2. 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 325
  3. 2021Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training datacited by 214
  4. 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 202
  5. 2020Noise-Induced Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 192
  6. 2021Quantum advantage in learning from experimentscited by 186
  7. 2020Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defensescited by 171
  8. 2019Efficient Learning for Deep Quantum Neural Networkscited by 160
  9. 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 130
  10. 2018Quantum generative adversarial networkscited by 128
  11. 2020Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning Attackscited by 109
  12. 2018Differentiable Learning of Quantum Circuit Born Machinecited by 90
  13. 2020Quantum noise protects quantum classifiers against adversariescited by 68
  14. 2019Quantum Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 64
  15. 2023Understanding quantum machine learning also requires rethinking generalizationcited by 48
  16. 2022Experimental quantum adversarial learning with programmable superconducting qubitscited by 38
  17. 2021Recent advances for quantum classifierscited by 35
  18. 2024A comprehensive review of Quantum Machine Learning: from NISQ to Fault Tolerancecited by 32
  19. 2023Generative quantum machine learning via denoising diffusion probabilistic modelscited by 30
  20. 2022Universal expressiveness of variational quantum classifiers and quantum kernels for support vector machinescited by 28
  21. 2022Benchmarking Adversarially Robust Quantum Machine Learning at Scalecited by 28
  22. 2023Towards quantum enhanced adversarial robustness in machine learningcited by 26
  23. 2020Optimal Provable Robustness of Quantum Classification via Quantum Hypothesis Testingcited by 23
  24. 2021Universal Adversarial Examples and Perturbations for Quantum Classifierscited by 22
  25. 2025Data Poisoning in Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 20
  26. 2019Information Scrambling in Quantum Neural Networkscited by 7
  27. 2024Image Classification with Rotation-Invariant Variational Quantum Circuitscited by 3
  28. 2022Efficient and quantum-adaptive machine learning with fermion neural networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.