mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

SMART: Semantic Matching Contrastive Learning for Partially View-Aligned Clustering

arXiv 2512.15396 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-view clustering has been empirically shown to improve learning performance by leveraging the inherent complementary information across multiple views of data. However, in real-world scenarios, collecting strictly aligned views is challenging, and learning from both aligned and unaligned data becomes a more practical solution. Partially View-aligned Clustering aims to learn correspondences between misaligned view samples to better exploit the potential consistency and complementarity across views, including both aligned and unaligned data. However, most existing PVC methods fail to leverage unaligned data to capture the shared semantics among samples from the same cluster. Moreover, the inherent heterogeneity of multi-view data induces distributional shifts in representations, leading to inaccuracies in establishing meaningful correspondences between cross-view latent features and, consequently, impairing learning effectiveness. To address these challenges, we propose a Semantic MAtching contRasTive learning model (SMART) for PVC. The main idea of our approach is to alleviate the influence of cross-view distributional shifts, thereby facilitating semantic matching contrastive learning to fully exploit semantic relationships in both aligned and unaligned data. Extensive experiments on eight benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing approaches on the PVC problem.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2025.

Builds on

20 of 84 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,712
  3. 2022Deep Clustering: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 78
  4. 2021Multi-level Feature Learning for Contrastive Multi-view Clusteringcited by 73
  5. 2021Reconsidering Representation Alignment for Multi-view Clusteringcited by 57
  6. 2023GCFAgg: Global and Cross-view Feature Aggregation for Multi-view Clusteringcited by 30
  7. 2023Decoupled Contrastive Multi-View Clustering with High-Order Random Walkscited by 23
  8. 2023Incomplete Multi-view Clustering via Prototype-based Imputationcited by 21
  9. 2023Investigating and Mitigating the Side Effects of Noisy Views for Self-Supervised Clustering Algorithms in Practical Multi-View Scenarioscited by 19
  10. 2023Unpaired Multi-View Graph Clustering with Cross-View Structure Matchingcited by 19
  11. 2023DealMVC: Dual Contrastive Calibration for Multi-view Clusteringcited by 19
  12. 2023Information Recovery-Driven Deep Incomplete Multiview Clustering Networkcited by 16
8 more
  1. 2023Incomplete Contrastive Multi-View Clustering with High-Confidence Guidingcited by 15
  2. 2023Semantic Invariant Multi-view Clustering with Fully Incomplete Informationcited by 12
  3. 2023Scalable Incomplete Multi-View Clustering with Structure Alignmentcited by 7
  4. 2025Imputation-free and Alignment-free: Incomplete Multi-view Clustering Driven by Consensus Semantic Learningcited by 7
  5. 2025Deep Incomplete Multi-view Clustering with Distribution Dual-Consistency Recovery Guidancecited by 4
  6. 2024Differentiable Information Bottleneck for Deterministic Multi-view Clusteringcited by 3
  7. 2024Dual-Optimized Adaptive Graph Reconstruction for Multi-View Graph Clusteringcited by 1
  8. 2025Refinement Contrastive Learning of Cell-Gene Associations for Unsupervised Cell Type Identificationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.