mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Incomplete Multi-view Clustering with Distribution Dual-Consistency Recovery Guidance

arXiv 2503.11017 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-view clustering leverages complementary representations from diverse sources to enhance performance. However, real-world data often suffer incomplete cases due to factors like privacy concerns and device malfunctions. A key challenge is effectively utilizing available instances to recover missing views. Existing methods frequently overlook the heterogeneity among views during recovery, leading to significant distribution discrepancies between recovered and true data. Additionally, many approaches focus on cross-view correlations, neglecting insights from intra-view reliable structure and cross-view clustering structure. To address these issues, we propose BURG, a novel method for incomplete multi-view clustering with distriBution dUal-consistency Recovery Guidance. We treat each sample as a distinct category and perform cross-view distribution transfer to predict the distribution space of missing views. To compensate for the lack of reliable category information, we design a dual-consistency guided recovery strategy that includes intra-view alignment guided by neighbor-aware consistency and cross-view alignment guided by prototypical consistency. Extensive experiments on benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of BURG in the incomplete multi-view scenario.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2025.

Builds on

27 of 61 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  4. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  5. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
  6. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,020
  7. 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 677
  8. 2020StyleFlow: Attribute-conditioned Exploration of StyleGAN-Generated Images using Conditional Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 348
  9. 2021Low-Light Image Enhancement with Normalizing Flowcited by 184
  10. 2016A Survey of Multi-View Representation Learningcited by 107
  11. 2021SPICE: Semantic Pseudo-labeling for Image Clusteringcited by 104
  12. 2022Deep Clustering: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 78
15 more
  1. 2020Deep Partial Multi-View Learningcited by 71
  2. 2022Twin Contrastive Learning for Online Clusteringcited by 60
  3. 2022Normalizing Flows for Human Pose Anomaly Detectioncited by 59
  4. 2021Self-Supervised Discriminative Feature Learning for Deep Multi-View Clusteringcited by 41
  5. 2022Fast Multi-view Clustering via Ensembles: Towards Scalability, Superiority, and Simplicitycited by 28
  6. 2020Generative Partial Multi-View Clusteringcited by 25
  7. 2023Decoupled Contrastive Multi-View Clustering with High-Order Random Walkscited by 23
  8. 2020SimpleMKKM: Simple Multiple Kernel K-meanscited by 20
  9. 2023Fast Continual Multi-View Clustering with Incomplete Viewscited by 19
  10. 2023DealMVC: Dual Contrastive Calibration for Multi-view Clusteringcited by 19
  11. 2023Incomplete Contrastive Multi-View Clustering with High-Confidence Guidingcited by 15
  12. 2023A Novel Approach for Effective Multi-View Clustering with Information-Theoretic Perspectivecited by 14
  13. 2023Semantic Invariant Multi-view Clustering with Fully Incomplete Informationcited by 12
  14. 2021Incomplete Multi-view Clustering via Cross-view Relation Transfercited by 10
  15. 2023Contrastive Continual Multi-view Clustering with Filtered Structural Fusioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.