mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Imputation-free and Alignment-free: Incomplete Multi-view Clustering Driven by Consensus Semantic Learning

arXiv 2505.11182 ↗First posted 16 May 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In incomplete multi-view clustering (IMVC), missing data induce prototype shifts within views and semantic inconsistencies across views. A feasible solution is to explore cross-view consistency in paired complete observations, further imputing and aligning the similarity relationships inherently shared across views. Nevertheless, existing methods are constrained by two-tiered limitations: (1) Neither instance- nor cluster-level consistency learning construct a semantic space shared across views to learn consensus semantics. The former enforces cross-view instances alignment, and wrongly regards unpaired observations with semantic consistency as negative pairs; the latter focuses on cross-view cluster counterparts while coarsely handling fine-grained intra-cluster relationships within views. (2) Excessive reliance on consistency results in unreliable imputation and alignment without incorporating view-specific cluster information. Thus, we propose an IMVC framework, imputation- and alignment-free for consensus semantics learning (FreeCSL). To bridge semantic gaps across all observations, we learn consensus prototypes from available data to discover a shared space, where semantically similar observations are pulled closer for consensus semantics learning. To capture semantic relationships within specific views, we design a heuristic graph clustering based on modularity to recover cluster structure with intra-cluster compactness and inter-cluster separation for cluster semantics enhancement. Extensive experiments demonstrate, compared to state-of-the-art competitors, FreeCSL achieves more confident and robust assignments on IMVC task.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.

Builds on

18 of 31 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  3. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
  4. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  5. 2021Multi-level Feature Learning for Contrastive Multi-view Clusteringcited by 73
  6. 2020Deep Partial Multi-View Learningcited by 71
  7. 2022Twin Contrastive Learning for Online Clusteringcited by 60
  8. 2021CLINE: Contrastive Learning with Semantic Negative Examples for Natural Language Understandingcited by 50
  9. 2023Deep Incomplete Multi-view Clustering with Cross-view Partial Sample and Prototype Alignmentcited by 33
  10. 2022Fast Multi-view Clustering via Ensembles: Towards Scalability, Superiority, and Simplicitycited by 28
  11. 2020Generative Partial Multi-View Clusteringcited by 25
  12. 2019Multi-view Deep Subspace Clustering Networkscited by 24
6 more
  1. 2023Decoupled Contrastive Multi-View Clustering with High-Order Random Walkscited by 23
  2. 2023Incomplete Multi-view Clustering via Prototype-based Imputationcited by 21
  3. 2023Incomplete Contrastive Multi-View Clustering with High-Confidence Guidingcited by 15
  4. 2021Incomplete Multi-view Clustering via Cross-view Relation Transfercited by 10
  5. 2023Efficient Token-Guided Image-Text Retrieval with Consistent Multimodal Contrastive Trainingcited by 10
  6. 2020Deep Incomplete Multi-View Multiple Clusteringscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

7 papers.