mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for Outliers -- Additional Material

arXiv 2512.10659 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Outlier detection identifies data points that significantly deviate from the majority of the data distribution. Explaining outliers is crucial for understanding the underlying factors that contribute to their detection, validating their significance, and identifying potential biases or errors. Effective explanations provide actionable insights, facilitating preventive measures to avoid similar outliers in the future. Counterfactual explanations clarify why specific data points are classified as outliers by identifying minimal changes required to alter their prediction. Although valuable, most existing counterfactual explanation methods overlook the unique challenges posed by outlier detection, and fail to target classical, widely adopted outlier detection algorithms. Local Outlier Factor (LOF) is one the most popular unsupervised outlier detection methods, quantifying outlierness through relative local density. Despite LOF's widespread use across diverse applications, it lacks interpretability. To address this limitation, we introduce Density-based Counterfactuals for Outliers (DCFO), a novel method specifically designed to generate counterfactual explanations for LOF. DCFO partitions the data space into regions where LOF behaves smoothly, enabling efficient gradient-based optimisation. Extensive experimental validation on 50 OpenML datasets demonstrates that DCFO consistently outperforms benchmarked competitors, offering superior proximity and validity of generated counterfactuals.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2025.

Builds on

13 of 53 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  2. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
  3. 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 526
  4. 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 254
  5. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 233
  6. 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
  7. 2019Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanationscited by 111
  8. 2023Diffusion Models for Counterfactual Generation and Anomaly Detection in Brain Imagescited by 30
  9. 2021Diverse, Global and Amortised Counterfactual Explanations for Uncertainty Estimatescited by 19
  10. 2022Framing Algorithmic Recourse for Anomaly Detectioncited by 5
  11. 2021Anomaly Attribution of Multivariate Time Series using Counterfactual Reasoningcited by 3
  12. 2025Show Me How: Benefits and Challenges of Agent-Augmented Counterfactual Explanations for Non-Expert Userscited by 2
1 more
  1. 2024AR-Pro: Counterfactual Explanations for Anomaly Repair with Formal Propertiescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.