Show Me How: Benefits and Challenges of Agent-Augmented Counterfactual Explanations for Non-Expert Users
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactual explanations offer actionable insights by illustrating how changes to inputs can lead to different outcomes. However, these explanations often suffer from ambiguity and impracticality, limiting their utility for non-expert users with limited AI knowledge. Augmenting counterfactual explanations with Large Language Models (LLMs) has been proposed as a solution, but little research has examined their benefits and challenges for non-experts. To address this gap, we developed a healthcare-focused system that leverages conversational AI agents to enhance counterfactual explanations, offering clear, actionable recommendations to help patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) reduce their risk. Evaluated through a mixed-methods study with 34 participants, our findings highlight the effectiveness of agent-augmented counterfactuals in improving actionable recommendations. Results further indicate that users with prior experience using conversational AI demonstrated greater effectiveness in utilising these explanations compared to novices. Furthermore, this paper introduces a set of generic guidelines for creating augmented counterfactual explanations, incorporating safeguards to mitigate common LLM pitfalls, such as hallucinations, and ensuring the explanations are both actionable and contextually relevant for non-expert users.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 28 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2025.
Builds on
28 of 74 references.
References · 28
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 605
- 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 328
- 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 260
- 2022Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matterscited by 222
- 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 180
- 2019Preserving Causal Constraints in Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 144
- 2019Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanationscited by 111
- 2021If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniquescited by 82
16 more
- 2022TalkToModel: Explaining Machine Learning Models with Interactive Natural Language Conversationscited by 66
- 2023ConvXAI: Delivering Heterogeneous AI Explanations via Conversations to Support Human-AI Scientific Writingcited by 31
- 2024Properties and Challenges of LLM-Generated Explanationscited by 24
- 2023Directive Explanations for Monitoring the Risk of Diabetes Onset: Introducing Directive Data-Centric Explanations and Combinations to Support What-If Explorationscited by 18
- 2024Zero-shot LLM-guided Counterfactual Generation: A Case Study on NLP Model Evaluationcited by 18
- 2021Directive Explanations for Actionable Explainability in Machine Learning Applicationscited by 14
- 2022From Black Boxes to Conversations: Incorporating XAI in a Conversational Agentcited by 14
- 2024EXMOS: Explanatory Model Steering Through Multifaceted Explanations and Data Configurationscited by 14
- 2023Towards Directive Explanations: Crafting Explainable AI Systems for Actionable Human-AI Interactionscited by 6
- 2024Using LLMs for Explaining Sets of Counterfactual Examples to Final Userscited by 6
- 2024Browse and Concentrate: Comprehending Multimodal Content via prior-LLM Context Fusioncited by 5
- 2024Explanatory Debiasing: Involving Domain Experts in the Data Generation Process to Mitigate Representation Bias in AI Systemscited by 5
- 2023Lessons Learned from EXMOS User Studies: A Technical Report Summarizing Key Takeaways from User Studies Conducted to Evaluate The EXMOS Platformcited by 4
- 2024An Explanatory Model Steering System for Collaboration between Domain Experts and AIcited by 4
- 2024Representation Debiasing of Generated Data Involving Domain Expertscited by 4
- 2023Providing personalized Explanations: a Conversational Approachcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Evidence-Based Counterspeech Against Health Misinformation
- 2026Improving Clinical Diagnosis with Counterfactual Multi-Agent Reasoning
- 2026Do LLM Self-Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior? Evaluating Counterfactual Simulatability with Pragmatic Perturbations
- 2026Would this change your answer? Evaluating Explanations of LLM Behavior In The Wild with Counterfactual Experiments
- 2025LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow Matching
- 2026Who Are You Explaining To? A Multi-Agent System for Audience-Aware XAI Narratives
- 2025LLMs Don't Know Their Own Decision Boundaries: The Unreliability of Self-Generated Counterfactual Explanations
- 2026Prompt-Counterfactual Explanations for Generative AI System Behavior