VIGIL: A Reflective Runtime for Self-Healing Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Agentic LLM frameworks promise autonomous behavior via task decomposition, tool use, and iterative planning, but most deployed systems remain brittle. They lack runtime introspection, cannot diagnose their own failure modes, and do not improve over time without human intervention. In practice, many agent stacks degrade into decorated chains of LLM calls with no structural mechanisms for reliability. We present VIGIL (Verifiable Inspection and Guarded Iterative Learning), a reflective runtime that supervises a sibling agent and performs autonomous maintenance rather than task execution. VIGIL ingests behavioral logs, appraises each event into a structured emotional representation, maintains a persistent EmoBank with decay and contextual policies, and derives an RBT diagnosis that sorts recent behavior into strengths, opportunities, and failures. From this analysis, VIGIL generates both guarded prompt updates that preserve core identity semantics and read only code proposals produced by a strategy engine that operates on log evidence and code hotspots. VIGIL functions as a state gated pipeline. Illegal transitions produce explicit errors rather than allowing the LLM to improvise. In a reminder latency case study, VIGIL identified elevated lag, proposed prompt and code repairs, and when its own diagnostic tool failed due to a schema conflict, it surfaced the internal error, produced a fallback diagnosis, and emitted a repair plan. This demonstrates meta level self repair in a deployed agent runtime.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2025.
Builds on
5 of 14 references.
References · 5
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026ATLAS-RTC: Closing the Loop on LLM Agent Output with Token-Level Runtime Control29 Mar 2026
- 2026AI Runtime Infrastructure28 Feb 2026
- 2026Wink: Recovering from Misbehaviors in Coding Agents19 Feb 2026
- 2026From Sycophancy to Sensemaking: Premise Governance for Human-AI Decision Making2 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026VIGIL: Runtime Enforcement of Behavioral Specifications in AI Agent Skills
- 2026A Self-Healing Framework for Reliable LLM-Based Autonomous Agents
- 2026EvoHarness-RL: Learning Self-Evolving Runtime Harness for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
- 2026Agent libOS: A Runtime Substrate for Capability-Controlled Self-Evolving LLM Agents
- 2026Evidence-Calibrated Runtime Reconstruction for Agent Skills Across Heterogeneous Coding Agents
- 2026Automata from Agent Traces: Failure and Next-Step Prediction
- 2026Argus: A General-Purpose Agentic Reasoning Runtime for Long-Horizon Tasks
- 2026BenchTrace: A Benchmark for Testing Reflection Ability and Controlled Evolution in LLM Agents