mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Self-Healing Framework for Reliable LLM-Based Autonomous Agents

arXiv 2605.06737 ↗First posted 7 May 2026cs.SE cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being utilized in complex software systems. However, reliability remains a significant challenge due to unpredictable failures such as hallucinations, execution errors, and inconsistent reasoning. This paper proposes a reliability-aware self-healing framework for LLM-based software agents. The framework integrates failure detection, reliability assessment, and automated recovery mechanisms. First, we define a taxonomy of failure types and introduce a quantitative reliability assessment model. Next, we propose a failure detection method that identifies abnormal agent behavior based on execution patterns and output consistency. Finally, we design a self-healing mechanism that dynamically recovers from failures through adaptive replanning and corrective prompting strategies. The proposed framework was implemented in a multi-agent workflow environment and evaluated using real-world task scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly increases task success rates, reduces failure propagation, and enhances overall system robustness compared to existing methods. In particular, this study distinguishes itself by establishing an integrated monitoring system that combines the agent's internal reasoning process with external execution results. These findings are expected to contribute to securing the stability of advanced autonomous systems and lowering the barriers to LLM adoption in production environments.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

16 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026AgentFixer: From Failure Detection to Fix Recommendations in LLM Agentic Systems18 Feb
  2. 2026ReliabilityBench: Evaluating LLM Agent Reliability Under Production-Like Stress Conditions3 Jan
  3. 2024Defining and Detecting the Defects of the Large Language Model-based Autonomous Agents24 Dec

Other references · 13

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  5. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  6. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  7. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
  8. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,190
  9. 2024Towards Lifelong Learning of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 64
  10. 2024Recent Advances of Foundation Language Models-based Continual Learning: A Surveycited by 46
  11. 2023Self-Adaptive Large Language Model (LLM)-Based Multiagent Systemscited by 31
  12. 2025E2E Process Automation Leveraging Generative AI and IDP-Based Automation Agent: A Case Study on Corporate Expense Processingcited by 5
1 more
  1. 2025A Study on the Framework for Evaluating the Ethics and Trustworthiness of Generative AIcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Self-Healing Agentic Orchestrators for Reliable Tool-Augmented Large Language Model Systems
  2. 2026When Agents Fail to Act: A Diagnostic Framework for Tool Invocation Reliability in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  3. 2025Exploring Autonomous Agents: A Closer Look at Why They Fail When Completing Tasks
  4. 2026Verified Tool Calls Improve LLM Agent Reliability Under Non-Atomic Failures
  5. 2026MAS-FIRE: Fault Injection and Reliability Evaluation for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
  6. 2025Failure Modes in LLM Systems: A System-Level Taxonomy for Reliable AI Applications
  7. 2024Towards Agentic Runtime Healing
  8. 2026Repair or Resample? Rethinking Failure Debugging in LLM Multi-Agent Systems