Croissant Tasks: A Metadata Format for Reproducible Machine Learning Evaluations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reproducibility is fundamental to the scientific method, yet remains a critical challenge in machine learning. Contributing factors include underspecified execution details and brittle software environments. Human-centric remedies, such as checklists and manual verification, help but require intensive effort and fail to scale. To address this, we introduce Croissant Tasks: a declarative, machine-actionable metadata format that abstracts low-level implementation details into high-level specifications. This format enables conceptual reproducibility: verifying claims via independent, agent-generated implementations rather than brittle source code replication. We contribute: (1) the Croissant Tasks specification, formally decoupling task problem from solution; (2) an automated LLM pipeline that retrofits existing benchmarks into this format; and (3) empirical validation showing autonomous agents can ingest these specifications to generate functional, accurate reproduction pipelines from scratch. We envision this format as a new foundation for automated and conceptual reproducibility in machine learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.
Builds on
17 of 71 references.
References · 17
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
- 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 286
- 2024Croissant: A Metadata Format for ML-Ready Datasetscited by 79
- 2021Codabench: Flexible, Easy-to-Use and Reproducible Benchmarking Platformcited by 65
- 2021A Systematic Review of Reproducibility Research in Natural Language Processingcited by 34
- 2024Reproducibility in Machine Learning-based Research: Overview, Barriers and Driverscited by 34
- 2025CoRe: Benchmarking LLMs Code Reasoning Capabilities through Static Analysis Taskscited by 24
- 2025NOVA: A Benchmark for Anomaly Localization and Clinical Reasoning in Brain MRIcited by 12
- 2024What is Reproducibility in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Research?cited by 11
5 more
- 2023Reproducibility of Machine Learning: Terminology, Recommendations and Open Issuescited by 8
- 2025MedSG-Bench: A Benchmark for Medical Image Sequences Groundingcited by 8
- 2025SAGE-Eval: Evaluating LLMs for Systematic Generalizations of Safety Factscited by 8
- 2025Eval Factsheets: A Structured Framework for Documenting AI Evaluationscited by 8
- 2025Snakemaker: Seamlessly transforming ad-hoc analyses into sustainable Snakemake workflows with generative AIcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.