mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Croissant Tasks: A Metadata Format for Reproducible Machine Learning Evaluations

arXiv 2605.29786 ↗First posted 28 May 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reproducibility is fundamental to the scientific method, yet remains a critical challenge in machine learning. Contributing factors include underspecified execution details and brittle software environments. Human-centric remedies, such as checklists and manual verification, help but require intensive effort and fail to scale. To address this, we introduce Croissant Tasks: a declarative, machine-actionable metadata format that abstracts low-level implementation details into high-level specifications. This format enables conceptual reproducibility: verifying claims via independent, agent-generated implementations rather than brittle source code replication. We contribute: (1) the Croissant Tasks specification, formally decoupling task problem from solution; (2) an automated LLM pipeline that retrofits existing benchmarks into this format; and (3) empirical validation showing autonomous agents can ingest these specifications to generate functional, accurate reproduction pipelines from scratch. We envision this format as a new foundation for automated and conceptual reproducibility in machine learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

Builds on

17 of 71 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  2. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
  3. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  4. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
  5. 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 286
  6. 2024Croissant: A Metadata Format for ML-Ready Datasetscited by 79
  7. 2021Codabench: Flexible, Easy-to-Use and Reproducible Benchmarking Platformcited by 65
  8. 2021A Systematic Review of Reproducibility Research in Natural Language Processingcited by 34
  9. 2024Reproducibility in Machine Learning-based Research: Overview, Barriers and Driverscited by 34
  10. 2025CoRe: Benchmarking LLMs Code Reasoning Capabilities through Static Analysis Taskscited by 24
  11. 2025NOVA: A Benchmark for Anomaly Localization and Clinical Reasoning in Brain MRIcited by 12
  12. 2024What is Reproducibility in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Research?cited by 11
5 more
  1. 2023Reproducibility of Machine Learning: Terminology, Recommendations and Open Issuescited by 8
  2. 2025MedSG-Bench: A Benchmark for Medical Image Sequences Groundingcited by 8
  3. 2025SAGE-Eval: Evaluating LLMs for Systematic Generalizations of Safety Factscited by 8
  4. 2025Eval Factsheets: A Structured Framework for Documenting AI Evaluationscited by 8
  5. 2025Snakemaker: Seamlessly transforming ad-hoc analyses into sustainable Snakemake workflows with generative AIcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.