mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Lean Unet: A Compact Model for Image Segmentation

arXiv 2512.03834 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2025cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unet and its variations have been standard in semantic image segmentation, especially for computer assisted radiology. Current Unet architectures iteratively downsample spatial resolution while increasing channel dimensions to preserve information content. Such a structure demands a large memory footprint, limiting training batch sizes and increasing inference latency. Channel pruning compresses Unet architecture without accuracy loss, but requires lengthy optimization and may not generalize across tasks and datasets. By investigating Unet pruning, we hypothesize that the final structure is the crucial factor, not the channel selection strategy of pruning. Based on our observations, we propose a lean Unet architecture (LUnet) with a compact, flat hierarchy where channels are not doubled as resolution is halved. We evaluate on a public MRI dataset allowing comparable reporting, as well as on two internal CT datasets. We show that a state-of-the-art pruning solution (STAMP) mainly prunes from the layers with the highest number of channels. Comparatively, simply eliminating a random channel at the pruning-identified layer or at the largest layer achieves similar or better performance. Our proposed LUnet with fixed architectures and over 30 times fewer parameters achieves performance comparable to both conventional Unet counterparts and data-adaptively pruned networks. The proposed lean Unet with constant channel count across layers requires far fewer parameters while achieving performance superior to standard Unet for the same total number of parameters. Skip connections allow Unet bottleneck channels to be largely reduced, unlike standard encoder-decoder architectures requiring increased bottleneck channels for information propagation.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2025.

Builds on

17 of 29 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  3. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
  4. 2017Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 702
  5. 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 599
  6. 2019UNet++: Redesigning Skip Connections to Exploit Multiscale Features in Image Segmentationcited by 586
  7. 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 583
  8. 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 479
  9. 2021UCTransNet: Rethinking the Skip Connections in U-Net from a Channel-wise Perspective with Transformercited by 197
  10. 2018Discrimination-aware Channel Pruning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 171
  11. 2023Neural Architecture Search: Insights from 1000 Paperscited by 139
  12. 2021Sparse Training via Boosting Pruning Plasticity with Neuroregenerationcited by 84
5 more
  1. 2021Probabilistic Spatial Analysis in Quantitative Microscopy with Uncertainty-Aware Cell Detection using Deep Bayesian Regression of Density Mapscited by 5
  2. 2022Sauron U-Net: Simple automated redundancy elimination in medical image segmentation via filter pruningcited by 5
  3. 2024Joint semi-supervised and contrastive learning enables domain generalization and multi-domain segmentationcited by 4
  4. 2021Learning Ultrasound Rendering from Cross-Sectional Model Slices for Simulated Trainingcited by 3
  5. 2024FGGP: Fixed-Rate Gradient-First Gradual Pruningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.