Probabilistic Spatial Analysis in Quantitative Microscopy with Uncertainty-Aware Cell Detection using Deep Bayesian Regression of Density Maps
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
3D microscopy is key in the investigation of diverse biological systems, and the ever increasing availability of large datasets demands automatic cell identification methods that not only are accurate, but also can imply the uncertainty in their predictions to inform about potential errors and hence confidence in conclusions using them. While conventional deep learning methods often yield deterministic results, advances in deep Bayesian learning allow for accurate predictions with a probabilistic interpretation in numerous image classification and segmentation tasks. It is however nontrivial to extend such Bayesian methods to cell detection, which requires specialized learning frameworks. In particular, regression of density maps is a popular successful approach for extracting cell coordinates from local peaks in a postprocessing step, which hinders any meaningful probabilistic output. We herein propose a deep learning-based cell detection framework that can operate on large microscopy images and outputs desired probabilistic predictions by (i) integrating Bayesian techniques for the regression of uncertainty-aware density maps, where peak detection can be applied to generate cell proposals, and (ii) learning a mapping from the numerous proposals to a probabilistic space that is calibrated, i.e. accurately represents the chances of a successful prediction. Utilizing such calibrated predictions, we propose a probabilistic spatial analysis with Monte-Carlo sampling. We demonstrate this in revising an existing description of the distribution of a mesenchymal stromal cell type within the bone marrow, where our proposed methods allow us to reveal spatial patterns that are otherwise undetectable. Introducing such probabilistic analysis in quantitative microscopy pipelines will allow for reporting confidence intervals for testing biological hypotheses of spatial distributions.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2021.
Builds on
30 of 87 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
- 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
18 more
- 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 763
- 2014Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognitioncited by 719
- 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
- 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 524
- 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 438
- 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 388
- 2015Bayesian SegNet: Model Uncertainty in Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architectures for Scene Understandingcited by 218
- 2018Cell Detection with Star-convex Polygonscited by 182
- 2019Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentationcited by 162
- 2015Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks with Bernoulli Approximate Variational Inferencecited by 159
- 2015End-to-end people detection in crowded scenescited by 140
- 2020Rethinking the Heatmap Regression for Bottom-up Human Pose Estimationcited by 69
- 2019Star-convex Polyhedra for 3D Object Detection and Segmentation in Microscopycited by 45
- 2019Automated Muscle Segmentation from Clinical CT using Bayesian U-Net for Personalized Musculoskeletal Modelingcited by 22
- 2020Deeply-Supervised Density Regression for Automatic Cell Counting in Microscopy Imagescited by 12
- 2019Siamese Networks with Location Prior for Landmark Tracking in Liver Ultrasound Sequencescited by 6
- 2020Modality Attention and Sampling Enables Deep Learning with Heterogeneous Marker Combinations in Fluorescence Microscopycited by 3
- 2021Utilizing Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learning Segmentation of Fluorescence Microscopy Images with Missing Markerscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023TeSLA: Test-Time Self-Learning With Automatic Adversarial Augmentationcited by 28
- 2023Weakly Supervised Joint Whole-Slide Segmentation and Classification in Prostate Cancercited by 10
- 2025Lean Unet: A Compact Model for Image Segmentationcited by 3
- 2025h-calibration: Rethinking Classifier Recalibration with Probabilistic Error-Bounded Objectivecited by 2
- 2023Novel deep learning methods for 3D flow field segmentation and classificationcited by 0
- 2025Lean Unet: A Compact Model for Image Segmentation3 Dec 2025
- 2025h-calibration: Rethinking Classifier Recalibration with Probabilistic Error-Bounded Objective22 Jun 2025
- 2023Novel deep learning methods for 3D flow field segmentation and classification10 May 2023
- 2023TeSLA: Test-Time Self-Learning With Automatic Adversarial Augmentation17 Mar 2023
- 2023Weakly Supervised Joint Whole-Slide Segmentation and Classification in Prostate Cancer7 Jan 2023