What to Preserve, Where to Adapt: A Depth-Wise Analysis of Forgetting in Continual Gynecological Image Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The clinical management of gynecological diseases often relies on medical imaging for diagnosis, treatment planning, and follow-up. Segmentation in this setting is challenging because successive tasks may differ in imaging modality, target anatomy, pathology, and annotation structure. Continual learning allows models to adapt to new tasks without simultaneous access to previous datasets. However, when successive tasks differ substantially, learning a new task can degrade performance on earlier ones, a problem known as catastrophic forgetting. Understanding where adaptation disrupts previous knowledge can help guide the design of more targeted continual-learning strategies. We investigate how forgetting changes as different parts of an encoder--decoder network are allowed to adapt. We progressively expand the trainable region of a 3D nnU-Net backbone from the bottleneck toward input- and output-proximal blocks. Under a shared learning rate, adaptation near the bottleneck largely preserves previous-task performance but provides limited current-task learning, whereas broader adaptation improves current-task performance but sharply increases forgetting. This trade-off persists even when the average change in trainable backbone parameters is approximately comparable. Assigning different learning rates to different blocks substantially reduces forgetting when part of the backbone is trainable, although this changes both the size and location of the updates. Forgetting still increases as more blocks are trained and remains severe when the full backbone is updated. These results show that forgetting depends not only on how much the model changes, but also on which parts of the model are allowed to change.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2026.
Builds on
22 of 35 references.
References · 22
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
- 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,044
- 2024nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 235
- 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
- 2020Anatomy of Catastrophic Forgetting: Hidden Representations and Task Semanticscited by 158
- 2019Are All Layers Created Equal?cited by 94
- 2025Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 52
- 2021Layerwise Optimization by Gradient Decomposition for Continual Learningcited by 51
- 2022Architecture Matters in Continual Learningcited by 46
10 more
- 2023MultiTalent: A Multi-Dataset Approach to Medical Image Segmentationcited by 45
- 2020What is Wrong with Continual Learning in Medical Image Segmentation?cited by 25
- 2022How to Fine-Tune Vision Models with SGDcited by 23
- 2023A Survey on Continual Semantic Segmentation: Theory, Challenge, Method and Applicationcited by 21
- 2023Does Continual Learning Equally Forget All Parameters?cited by 18
- 2022Continual Hippocampus Segmentation with Transformerscited by 11
- 2024Distribution-Aware Replay for Continual MRI Segmentationcited by 3
- 2025Lean Unet: A Compact Model for Image Segmentationcited by 3
- 2023ECPC-IDS:A benchmark endometrail cancer PET/CT image dataset for evaluation of semantic segmentation and detection of hypermetabolic regionscited by 1
- 2024MBA-Net: SAM-driven Bidirectional Aggregation Network for Ovarian Tumor Segmentationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.