Merge and Bound: Direct Manipulations on Weights for Class Incremental Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a novel training approach, named Merge-and-Bound (M&B) for Class Incremental Learning (CIL), which directly manipulates model weights in the parameter space for optimization. Our algorithm involves two types of weight merging: inter-task weight merging and intra-task weight merging. Inter-task weight merging unifies previous models by averaging the weights of models from all previous stages. On the other hand, intra-task weight merging facilitates the learning of current task by combining the model parameters within current stage. For reliable weight merging, we also propose a bounded update technique that aims to optimize the target model with minimal cumulative updates and preserve knowledge from previous tasks; this strategy reveals that it is possible to effectively obtain new models near old ones, reducing catastrophic forgetting. M&B is seamlessly integrated into existing CIL methods without modifying architecture components or revising learning objectives. We extensively evaluate our algorithm on standard CIL benchmarks and demonstrate superior performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2025.
Builds on
32 of 38 references.
References · 32
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,653
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,361
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
20 more
- 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
- 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2019Large Scale Incremental Learningcited by 732
- 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 614
- 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 588
- 2016Conditional Image Synthesis With Auxiliary Classifier GANscited by 565
- 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 368
- 2018Re-evaluating Continual Learning Scenarios: A Categorization and Case for Strong Baselinescited by 228
- 2020Mnemonics Training: Multi-Class Incremental Learning without Forgettingcited by 221
- 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
- 2019Learning to Remember: A Synaptic Plasticity Driven Framework for Continual Learningcited by 182
- 2020Adaptive Aggregation Networks for Class-Incremental Learningcited by 149
- 2022Class-Incremental Learning by Knowledge Distillation with Adaptive Feature Consolidationcited by 113
- 2019Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting with Unlabeled Data in the Wildcited by 111
- 2020Generative Feature Replay For Class-Incremental Learningcited by 109
- 2021On Learning the Geodesic Path for Incremental Learningcited by 85
- 2020Distance-Based Regularisation of Deep Networks for Fine-Tuningcited by 48
- 2023Trainable Projected Gradient Method for Robust Fine-tuningcited by 37
Built on by
Not cited yet.