mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DeCoRL: Decoupling Reasoning Chains via Parallel Sub-Step Generation and Cascaded Reinforcement for Interpretable and Scalable RLHF

arXiv 2511.19097 ↗First posted 11 Nov 2025cs.CLcited by 7

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Existing reinforcement learning methods for Chain-of-Thought reasoning suffer from two critical limitations. First, they operate as monolithic black boxes that provide undifferentiated reward signals, obscuring individual step contributions and hindering error diagnosis. Second, sequential decoding has O(n) time complexity. This makes real-time deployment impractical for complex reasoning tasks. We present DeCoRL (Decoupled Reasoning Chains via Coordinated Reinforcement Learning), a novel framework that transforms reasoning from sequential processing into collaborative modular orchestration. DeCoRL trains lightweight specialized models to generate reasoning sub-steps concurrently, eliminating sequential bottlenecks through parallel processing. To enable precise error attribution, the framework designs modular reward functions that score each sub-step independently. Cascaded DRPO optimization then coordinates these rewards while preserving inter-step dependencies. Comprehensive evaluation demonstrates state-of-the-art results across RM-Bench, RMB, and RewardBench, outperforming existing methods including large-scale models. DeCoRL delivers 3.8 times faster inference while maintaining superior solution quality and offers a 22.7% improvement in interpretability through explicit reward attribution. These advancements, combined with a 72.4% reduction in energy consumption and a 68% increase in throughput, make real-time deployment of complex reasoning systems a reality.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 26 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.

Builds on

26 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modeling3 Apr
  2. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning13 Jan
  3. 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoning9 Dec
  4. 2024Self-Generated Critiques Boost Reward Modeling for Language Models25 Nov
  5. 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMs24 Oct
  6. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision5 Jun
  7. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
  8. 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
  9. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May

Other references · 17

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  6. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  7. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  8. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  9. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 369
  10. 2024Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMscited by 265
  11. 2024RM-Bench: Benchmarking Reward Models of Language Models with Subtlety and Stylecited by 168
  12. 2024LLM Critics Help Catch LLM Bugscited by 138
5 more
  1. 2024HelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with Preferencescited by 129
  2. 2024RMB: Comprehensively Benchmarking Reward Models in LLM Alignmentcited by 60
  3. 2022DABERT: Dual Attention Enhanced BERT for Semantic Matchingcited by 21
  4. 2025Not All Parameters Are Created Equal: Smart Isolation Boosts Fine-Tuning Performancecited by 13
  5. 2025Structural Reward Model: Enhancing Interpretability, Efficiency, and Scalability in Reward Modelingcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Rethinking Reasoning Quality in Large Language Models through Enhanced Chain-of-Thought via RL
  2. 2026Drop the Act: Probe-Filtered RL for Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  3. 2025Reasoning Vectors: Transferring Chain-of-Thought Capabilities via Task Arithmetic
  4. 2026SARL: Label-Free Reinforcement Learning by Rewarding Reasoning Topology
  5. 2025Multi-Path Collaborative Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026Stepwise Penalization for Length-Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  7. 2026From Base Rollouts to RL Reasoning: A Budgeted Search Perspective
  8. 2025Dissecting Long-Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Models: An Empirical Study