mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SARL: Label-Free Reinforcement Learning by Rewarding Reasoning Topology

arXiv 2603.27977 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning is critical to improving large reasoning models, but its success relies heavily on verifiable rewards (RLVR), making it hard to use in open-ended domains where correctness is ambiguous and cannot be verified. Moreover, reasoning trajectories remain largely unconstrained, and optimizing solely toward the final answer can favor early exploitation over generalization. In this work, we ask whether general reasoning ability can be improved by teaching models how to think (the structure of reasoning) rather than what to produce (the outcome of reasoning), and we extend traditional RLVR to open-ended settings. We introduce Structure-Aware Reinforcement Learning (SARL), a label-free framework that constructs per-response reasoning maps from intermediate thinking steps and rewards their reasoning topology. SARL shifts supervision from destination to path, encouraging reasoning trajectories that are both locally coherent and globally efficient. On verifiable math tasks, SARL outperforms prior label-free RL baselines and even exceeds RL methods with ground truth supervision, with average gains of +9.1% under PPO and +11.6% under GRPO across four math benchmarks, with particularly large improvements on AIME25 (+35.5% with PPO and +44.7% with GRPO). On non-verifiable open-ended tasks, SARL achieves average gains of +34.6% under PPO and +30.4% under GRPO on WildBench across five task categories, outperforming prior label-free RL methods and DPO, which relies on additional preference labels. Beyond strong performance, SARL exhibits substantially lower KL divergence and higher policy entropy, indicating more stable and exploratory training dynamics. Code and data are available at hrefhttps://github.com/cacayaya/SARLCode Link.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 30 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.

Builds on

30 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Learning to Reason without External Rewards26 May
  2. 2025The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoning21 May
  3. 2025Process Reward Models That Think23 Apr
  4. 2025TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning22 Apr
  5. 2025Right Question is Already Half the Answer: Fully Unsupervised LLM Reasoning Incentivization8 Apr
  6. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
  7. 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoning16 Oct
  8. 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
  9. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May

Other references · 21

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  6. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  7. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  8. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  9. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
  10. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
  11. 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 297
  12. 2024WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wildcited by 218
9 more
  1. 2025OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignmentcited by 132
  2. 2025Topology of Reasoning: Understanding Large Reasoning Models through Reasoning Graph Propertiescited by 29
  3. 2025What Characterizes Effective Reasoning? Revisiting Length, Review, and Structure of CoTcited by 25
  4. 2025The Geometry of Reasoning: Flowing Logics in Representation Spacecited by 21
  5. 2016Small-World Brain Networks Revisitedcited by 16
  6. 2025Surrogate Signals from Format and Length: Reinforcement Learning for Solving Mathematical Problems without Ground Truth Answerscited by 11
  7. 2025The Shape of Reasoning: Topological Analysis of Reasoning Traces in Large Language Modelscited by 9
  8. 2021Segregation, integration and balance of large-scale resting brain networks configure different cognitive abilitiescited by 6
  9. 2018Navigation of brain networkscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025You Need Reasoning to Learn Reasoning: The Limitations of Label-Free RL in Weak Base Models
  2. 2026Curriculum Reinforcement Learning Can Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model
  3. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs
  4. 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers
  5. 2025Thinking-Free Policy Initialization Makes Distilled Reasoning Models More Effective and Efficient Reasoners
  6. 2025Rethinking Reasoning Quality in Large Language Models through Enhanced Chain-of-Thought via RL
  7. 2026SCOPE-RL: Optimizing Reasoning Paths Before and After Success
  8. 2026Graph Reasoning Paradigm: Structured and Symbolic Reasoning with Topology-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models