mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Mathematical Framework for Custom Reward Functions in Job Application Evaluation using Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2511.16073 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.MAcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL training of language and agent models

Abstract (arXiv)

Most of the traditional Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) depend on strict matching using keywords, where candidates that are highly qualified are many times disqualified because of minor semantic differences. In this article, the two-stage process of developing a more comprehensive resume assessment system based on a small language model that is trained with fewer than 600M parameters is introduced and fine-tuned by using GRPO with a uniquely designed reward function. The initial stage is Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), which is used to create a strong base model with the ability to perceive resumes beyond superficial overlap of keywords. This SFT model is further optimized in the second step with Reinforcement Learning (RL) via GRPO with the help of multi-component-based rewarding, which will not be considered as a commission of tokens matching. In the initial RL experiments, we found a severe difficulty in the shape of reward hacking: overly aggressive penalty terms resulted in unstable training dynamics and prohibitively negative model behavior. This was solved by trial-and-error refinement of the reward and careful training hyperparameter tuning, which led to a stable and controlled process of gentle polishing. The GRPO-refined model shows high real-life performance, as it shows an accuracy of 91% on unseen data used for testing. It has a high recall of 0.85 on the SELECTED class with a perfect precision of 1.0, which highlights its high reliability for identifying qualified applicants. These findings demonstrate that an appropriately structured two-step fine-tuning pipeline can effectively be used to transfer a small language model into human-like candidate evaluation, surpassing the shortcomings of both traditional ATS systems and unrefined uses of reinforcement learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL training of language and agent models, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 7 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2025.

Builds on

7 of 11 references.

References · 7

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  4. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
  5. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 759
  6. 2025Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AIcited by 270
  7. 2025Reward Hacking Mitigation using Verifiable Composite Rewardscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025RankPO: Preference Optimization for Job-Talent Matching
  2. 2026Designing Reward Signals for Portable Query Generation: A Case Study in Industrial Semantic Job Search
  3. 2025Foundation Models at Work: Fine-Tuning for Fairness in Algorithmic Hiring
  4. 2026STAR-GRPO: Canonical Anchoring and Reliability-First Advantages against Representation-Dependent Reward Hacking
  5. 2026Where to Start, How to Move: Analyzing Curricula under GRPO for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
  6. 2026When Right Meets Wrong: Bilateral Context Conditioning with Reward-Confidence Correction for GRPO
  7. 2026Range-GRPO: Policy Optimization via Pairwise Relations among Reward Intervals
  8. 2026GOPO: Policy Optimization using Ranked Rewards