mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Foundation Models at Work: Fine-Tuning for Fairness in Algorithmic Hiring

arXiv 2501.07324 ↗First posted 13 Jan 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation models require fine-tuning to ensure their generative outputs align with intended results for specific tasks. Automating this fine-tuning process is challenging, as it typically needs human feedback that can be expensive to acquire. We present AutoRefine, a method that leverages reinforcement learning for targeted fine-tuning, utilizing direct feedback from measurable performance improvements in specific downstream tasks. We demonstrate the method for a problem arising in algorithmic hiring platforms where linguistic biases influence a recommendation system. In this setting, a generative model seeks to rewrite given job specifications to receive more diverse candidate matches from a recommendation engine which matches jobs to candidates. Our model detects and regulates biases in job descriptions to meet diversity and fairness criteria. The experiments on a public hiring dataset and a real-world hiring platform showcase how large language models can assist in identifying and mitigation biases in the real world.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2025.

Builds on

25 of 42 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  7. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  9. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  10. 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
  11. 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
  12. 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 736
13 more
  1. 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 703
  2. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 346
  3. 2021Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLPcited by 336
  4. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  5. 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 245
  6. 2020Towards Debiasing Sentence Representationscited by 170
  7. 2018Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Datacited by 166
  8. 2021RedditBias: A Real-World Resource for Bias Evaluation and Debiasing of Conversational Language Modelscited by 149
  9. 2022Offline RL for Natural Language Generation with Implicit Language Q Learningcited by 137
  10. 2021Debiasing Pre-trained Contextualised Embeddingscited by 107
  11. 2023Measuring Inductive Biases of In-Context Learning with Underspecified Demonstrationscited by 49
  12. 2023Disentangling Perceptions of Offensiveness: Cultural and Moral Correlatescited by 26
  13. 2023Debiasing should be Good and Bad: Measuring the Consistency of Debiasing Techniques in Language Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.