Foundation Models at Work: Fine-Tuning for Fairness in Algorithmic Hiring
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundation models require fine-tuning to ensure their generative outputs align with intended results for specific tasks. Automating this fine-tuning process is challenging, as it typically needs human feedback that can be expensive to acquire. We present AutoRefine, a method that leverages reinforcement learning for targeted fine-tuning, utilizing direct feedback from measurable performance improvements in specific downstream tasks. We demonstrate the method for a problem arising in algorithmic hiring platforms where linguistic biases influence a recommendation system. In this setting, a generative model seeks to rewrite given job specifications to receive more diverse candidate matches from a recommendation engine which matches jobs to candidates. Our model detects and regulates biases in job descriptions to meet diversity and fairness criteria. The experiments on a public hiring dataset and a real-world hiring platform showcase how large language models can assist in identifying and mitigation biases in the real world.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2025.
Builds on
25 of 42 references.
References · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
- 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
- 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 736
13 more
- 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 703
- 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 346
- 2021Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLPcited by 336
- 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
- 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 245
- 2020Towards Debiasing Sentence Representationscited by 170
- 2018Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Datacited by 166
- 2021RedditBias: A Real-World Resource for Bias Evaluation and Debiasing of Conversational Language Modelscited by 149
- 2022Offline RL for Natural Language Generation with Implicit Language Q Learningcited by 137
- 2021Debiasing Pre-trained Contextualised Embeddingscited by 107
- 2023Measuring Inductive Biases of In-Context Learning with Underspecified Demonstrationscited by 49
- 2023Disentangling Perceptions of Offensiveness: Cultural and Moral Correlatescited by 26
- 2023Debiasing should be Good and Bad: Measuring the Consistency of Debiasing Techniques in Language Modelscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.