SURFing to the Fundamental Limit of Jet Tagging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Beyond the practical goal of improving search and measurement sensitivity through better jet tagging algorithms, there is a deeper question: what are their upper performance limits? Generative surrogate models with learned likelihood functions offer a new approach to this problem, provided the surrogate correctly captures the underlying data distribution. In this work, we introduce the SUrrogate ReFerence (SURF) method, a new approach to validating generative models. This framework enables exact Neyman-Pearson tests by training the target model on samples from another tractable surrogate, which is itself trained on real data. We argue that the EPiC-FM generative model is a valid surrogate reference for JetClass jets and apply SURF to show that modern jet taggers may already be operating close to the true statistical limit. By contrast, we find that autoregressive GPT models unphysically exaggerate top vs. QCD separation power encoded in the surrogate reference, implying that they are giving a misleading picture of the fundamental limit.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2025.
Builds on
23 of 47 references.
References · 23
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2017Deep Setscited by 1,421
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 995
- 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transportcited by 879
- 2016Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Modelscited by 272
- 2023Generalization in diffusion models arises from geometry-adaptive harmonic representationscited by 185
- 2019The Convergence Rate of Neural Networks for Learned Functions of Different Frequenciescited by 135
- 2016Tying Word Vectors and Word Classifiers: A Loss Framework for Language Modelingcited by 92
- 2018Energy Flow Networks: Deep Sets for Particle Jetscited by 84
- 2019ParticleNet: Jet Tagging via Particle Cloudscited by 64
- 2025On the Closed-Form of Flow Matching: Generalization Does Not Arise from Target Stochasticitycited by 50
11 more
- 2021CaloFlow: Fast and Accurate Generation of Calorimeter Showers with Normalizing Flowscited by 46
- 2024Masked Particle Modeling on Sets: Towards Self-Supervised High Energy Physics Foundation Modelscited by 46
- 2024OmniJet-α: The first cross-task foundation model for particle physicscited by 43
- 2024CaloChallenge 2022: A Community Challenge for Fast Calorimeter Simulationcited by 35
- 2022Evaluating generative models in high energy physicscited by 31
- 2023Explainable Equivariant Neural Networks for Particle Physics: PELICANcited by 24
- 2023EPiC-GAN: Equivariant Point Cloud Generation for Particle Jetscited by 23
- 2025Generalization through variance: how noise shapes inductive biases in diffusion modelscited by 23
- 2023Diffusion Noise Feature: Accurate and Fast Generated Image Detectioncited by 21
- 2023EPiC-ly Fast Particle Cloud Generation with Flow-Matching and Diffusioncited by 17
- 2025Learning to Validate Generative Models: a Goodness-of-Fit Approachcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026Neural Scaling Laws for Boosted Jet Taggingcited by 12
- 2025Enhancing next token prediction based pre-training for jet foundation modelscited by 3
- 2026Generative Models and Statistical Validationcited by 2
- 2026Generative Models and Statistical Validation28 May 2026
- 2026Neural Scaling Laws for Boosted Jet Tagging17 Feb 2026
- 2025Enhancing next token prediction based pre-training for jet foundation models3 Dec 2025