Learning to Validate Generative Models: a Goodness-of-Fit Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative models are increasingly central to scientific workflows, yet their systematic use and interpretation require a proper understanding of their limitations through rigorous validation. Classic approaches struggle with scalability, statistical power, or interpretability when applied to high-dimensional data, making it difficult to certify the reliability of these models in realistic, high-dimensional scientific settings. Here, we propose the use of the New Physics Learning Machine (NPLM), a learning-based approach to goodness-of-fit testing inspired by the Neyman--Pearson construction, to test generative networks trained on high-dimensional scientific data. We demonstrate the performance of NPLM for validation in two benchmark cases: generative models trained on mixtures of Gaussian models with increasing dimensionality, and a public end-to-end model, known as FlowSim, developed to generate high-energy physics collision events. We demonstrate that the NPLM can serve as a powerful validation method while also providing a means to diagnose sub-optimally modeled regions of the data.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.
Builds on
19 of 43 references.
References · 19
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
- 2016Generalization Properties of Learning with Random Featurescited by 163
- 2015Less is More: Nystr"om Computational Regularizationcited by 89
- 2020Kernel methods through the roof: handling billions of points efficientlycited by 88
- 2024CaloChallenge 2022: A Community Challenge for Fast Calorimeter Simulationcited by 34
- 2022Evaluating generative models in high energy physicscited by 31
- 2022Learning new physics efficiently with nonparametric methodscited by 20
- 2023Goodness of fit by Neyman-Pearson testingcited by 10
- 2022Testing the boundaries: Normalizing Flows for higher dimensional data setscited by 7
7 more
- 2023Fast kernel methods for Data Quality Monitoring as a goodness-of-fit testcited by 7
- 2024Multiple testing for signal-agnostic searches of new physics with machine learningcited by 7
- 2023Comparison of Affine and Rational Quadratic Spline Coupling and Autoregressive Flows through Robust Statistical Testscited by 5
- 2024A Comprehensive Evaluation of Generative Models in Calorimeter Shower Simulationcited by 5
- 2024Calibrating Bayesian Generative Machine Learning for Bayesiamplificationcited by 5
- 2025Comparing Generative Models with the New Physics Learning Machinecited by 4
- 2023The NFLikelihood: an unsupervised DNNLikelihood from Normalizing Flowscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2026Are We Ready for AI-Driven Discovery? AI Verification Before the Next Fundamental Physics Breakthrough10 Jul 2026
- 2026Generative Models and Statistical Validation28 May 2026
- 2026Neural Scaling Laws for Jet Generation27 May 2026
- 2025SURFing to the Fundamental Limit of Jet Tagging19 Nov 2025