mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to Validate Generative Models: a Goodness-of-Fit Approach

arXiv 2511.09118 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2025stat.ML cs.LG hep-excited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative models are increasingly central to scientific workflows, yet their systematic use and interpretation require a proper understanding of their limitations through rigorous validation. Classic approaches struggle with scalability, statistical power, or interpretability when applied to high-dimensional data, making it difficult to certify the reliability of these models in realistic, high-dimensional scientific settings. Here, we propose the use of the New Physics Learning Machine (NPLM), a learning-based approach to goodness-of-fit testing inspired by the Neyman--Pearson construction, to test generative networks trained on high-dimensional scientific data. We demonstrate the performance of NPLM for validation in two benchmark cases: generative models trained on mixtures of Gaussian models with increasing dimensionality, and a public end-to-end model, known as FlowSim, developed to generate high-energy physics collision events. We demonstrate that the NPLM can serve as a powerful validation method while also providing a means to diagnose sub-optimally modeled regions of the data.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.

Builds on

19 of 43 references.

References · 19

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  2. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  3. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  4. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
  5. 2016Generalization Properties of Learning with Random Featurescited by 163
  6. 2015Less is More: Nystr"om Computational Regularizationcited by 89
  7. 2020Kernel methods through the roof: handling billions of points efficientlycited by 88
  8. 2024CaloChallenge 2022: A Community Challenge for Fast Calorimeter Simulationcited by 34
  9. 2022Evaluating generative models in high energy physicscited by 31
  10. 2022Learning new physics efficiently with nonparametric methodscited by 20
  11. 2023Goodness of fit by Neyman-Pearson testingcited by 10
  12. 2022Testing the boundaries: Normalizing Flows for higher dimensional data setscited by 7
7 more
  1. 2023Fast kernel methods for Data Quality Monitoring as a goodness-of-fit testcited by 7
  2. 2024Multiple testing for signal-agnostic searches of new physics with machine learningcited by 7
  3. 2023Comparison of Affine and Rational Quadratic Spline Coupling and Autoregressive Flows through Robust Statistical Testscited by 5
  4. 2024A Comprehensive Evaluation of Generative Models in Calorimeter Shower Simulationcited by 5
  5. 2024Calibrating Bayesian Generative Machine Learning for Bayesiamplificationcited by 5
  6. 2025Comparing Generative Models with the New Physics Learning Machinecited by 4
  7. 2023The NFLikelihood: an unsupervised DNNLikelihood from Normalizing Flowscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.