mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Small Language Models for Phishing Website Detection: Cost, Performance, and Privacy Trade-Offs

arXiv 2511.15434 ↗First posted 19 Nov 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Phishing websites pose a major cybersecurity threat, exploiting unsuspecting users and causing significant financial and organisational harm. Traditional machine learning approaches for phishing detection often require extensive feature engineering, continuous retraining, and costly infrastructure maintenance. At the same time, proprietary large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in phishing-related classification tasks, but their operational costs and reliance on external providers limit their practical adoption in many business environments. This paper investigates the feasibility of small language models (SLMs) for detecting phishing websites using only their raw HTML code. A key advantage of these models is that they can be deployed on local infrastructure, providing organisations with greater control over data and operations. We systematically evaluate 15 commonly used Small Language Models (SLMs), ranging from 1 billion to 70 billion parameters, benchmarking their classification accuracy, computational requirements, and cost-efficiency. Our results highlight the trade-offs between detection performance and resource consumption, demonstrating that while SLMs underperform compared to state-of-the-art proprietary LLMs, they can still provide a viable and scalable alternative to external LLM services. By presenting a comparative analysis of costs and benefits, this work lays the foundation for future research on the adaptation, fine-tuning, and deployment of SLMs in phishing detection systems, aiming to balance security effectiveness and economic practicality.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2025.

Builds on

14 of 44 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexitycited by 1,474
  3. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 387
  4. 2022On The Computational Complexity of Self-Attentioncited by 139
  5. 2024Challenges in Deploying Long-Context Transformers: A Theoretical Peak Performance Analysiscited by 44
  6. 2024ChatSpamDetector: Leveraging Large Language Models for Effective Phishing Email Detectioncited by 25
  7. 2023Scaling Down to Scale Up: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Replacing OpenAI's LLM with Open Source SLMs in Productioncited by 21
  8. 2020High Accuracy Phishing Detection Based on Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 7
  9. 2024Multimodal Large Language Models for Phishing Webpage Detection and Identificationcited by 7
  10. 2024From ML to LLM: Evaluating the Robustness of Phishing Webpage Detection Models against Adversarial Attackscited by 6
  11. 2022Towards Web Phishing Detection Limitations and Mitigationcited by 5
  12. 2025PhishDebate: An LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework for Phishing Website Detectioncited by 3
2 more
  1. 2025PhishParrot: LLM-Driven Adaptive Crawling to Unveil Cloaked Phishing Sitescited by 3
  2. 2025Characterizing Phishing Pages by JavaScript Capabilitiescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.