mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multimodal Large Language Models for Phishing Webpage Detection and Identification

arXiv 2408.05941 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2024cs.CR cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To address the challenging problem of detecting phishing webpages, researchers have developed numerous solutions, in particular those based on machine learning (ML) algorithms. Among these, brand-based phishing detection that uses models from Computer Vision to detect if a given webpage is imitating a well-known brand has received widespread attention. However, such models are costly and difficult to maintain, as they need to be retrained with labeled dataset that has to be regularly and continuously collected. Besides, they also need to maintain a good reference list of well-known websites and related meta-data for effective performance. In this work, we take steps to study the efficacy of large language models (LLMs), in particular the multimodal LLMs, in detecting phishing webpages. Given that the LLMs are pretrained on a large corpus of data, we aim to make use of their understanding of different aspects of a webpage (logo, theme, favicon, etc.) to identify the brand of a given webpage and compare the identified brand with the domain name in the URL to detect a phishing attack. We propose a two-phase system employing LLMs in both phases: the first phase focuses on brand identification, while the second verifies the domain. We carry out comprehensive evaluations on a newly collected dataset. Our experiments show that the LLM-based system achieves a high detection rate at high precision; importantly, it also provides interpretable evidence for the decisions. Our system also performs significantly better than a state-of-the-art brand-based phishing detection system while demonstrating robustness against two known adversarial attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2024.

Builds on

17 of 50 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2024AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvementcited by 272
  4. 2017Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 153
  5. 2023Abusing Images and Sounds for Indirect Instruction Injection in Multi-Modal LLMscited by 117
  6. 2018Tranco: A Research-Oriented Top Sites Ranking Hardened Against Manipulationcited by 61
  7. 2024WIPI: A New Web Threat for LLM-Driven Web Agentscited by 50
  8. 2023You Only Prompt Once: On the Capabilities of Prompt Learning on Large Language Models to Tackle Toxic Contentcited by 37
  9. 2024KnowPhish: Large Language Models Meet Multimodal Knowledge Graphs for Enhancing Reference-Based Phishing Detectioncited by 29
  10. 2024ChatSpamDetector: Leveraging Large Language Models for Effective Phishing Email Detectioncited by 25
  11. 2024LLMs for Cyber Security: New Opportunitiescited by 11
  12. 2022Multi-SpacePhish: Extending the Evasion-space of Adversarial Attacks against Phishing Website Detectors using Machine Learningcited by 7
5 more
  1. 2024From ML to LLM: Evaluating the Robustness of Phishing Webpage Detection Models against Adversarial Attackscited by 6
  2. 2024"Are Adversarial Phishing Webpages a Threat in Reality?" Understanding the Users' Perception of Adversarial Webpagescited by 4
  3. 2024Evaluating the Effectiveness and Robustness of Visual Similarity-based Phishing Detection Modelscited by 4
  4. 2022Phishing Detection Leveraging Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 3
  5. 2023Attacking logo-based phishing website detectors with adversarial perturbationscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024PhishAgent: A Robust Multimodal Agent for Phishing Webpage Detection
  2. 2025Evaluating Large Language Models for Phishing Detection, Self-Consistency, Faithfulness, and Explainability
  3. 2024LLMs are One-Shot URL Classifiers and Explainers
  4. 2025Phishing Detection in the Gen-AI Era: Quantized LLMs vs Classical Models
  5. 2025Adaptive Linguistic Prompting (ALP) Enhances Phishing Webpage Detection in Multimodal Large Language Models
  6. 2025PhishDebate: An LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework for Phishing Website Detection
  7. 2026User-Centric Phishing Detection: A RAG and LLM-Based Approach ↗
  8. 2024Next-Generation Phishing: How LLM Agents Empower Cyber Attackers