From ML to LLM: Evaluating the Robustness of Phishing Webpage Detection Models against Adversarial Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Phishing attacks attempt to deceive users into stealing sensitive information, posing a significant cybersecurity threat. Advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have led to the development of numerous phishing webpage detection solutions, but these models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Evaluating their robustness against adversarial phishing webpages is essential. Existing tools contain datasets of pre-designed phishing webpages for a limited number of brands, and lack diversity in phishing features. To address these challenges, we develop PhishOracle, a tool that generates adversarial phishing webpages by embedding diverse phishing features into legitimate webpages. We evaluate the robustness of three existing task-specific models - Stack model, VisualPhishNet, and Phishpedia - against PhishOracle-generated adversarial phishing webpages and observe a significant drop in their detection rates. In contrast, a multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based phishing detector demonstrates stronger robustness against these adversarial attacks but still is prone to evasion. Our findings highlight the vulnerability of phishing detection models to adversarial attacks, emphasizing the need for more robust detection approaches. Furthermore, we conduct a user study to evaluate whether PhishOracle-generated adversarial phishing webpages can deceive users. The results show that many of these phishing webpages evade not only existing detection models but also users.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Multimodal Large Language Models for Phishing Webpage Detection and Identificationcited by 6
- 2024Exposing LLM Vulnerabilities: Adversarial Scam Detection and Performancecited by 4
- 2025Benchmarking LLM-Assisted Blue Teaming via Standardized Threat Huntingcited by 4
- 2026Adversarial News and Lost Profits: Manipulating Headlines in LLM-Driven Algorithmic Tradingcited by 4
- 2025Phishing Detection in the Gen-AI Era: Quantized LLMs vs Classical Modelscited by 1
- 2025Small Language Models for Phishing Website Detection: Cost, Performance, and Privacy Trade-Offscited by 1
- 2026Adversarial News and Lost Profits: Manipulating Headlines in LLM-Driven Algorithmic Trading19 Jan 2026
- 2025Small Language Models for Phishing Website Detection: Cost, Performance, and Privacy Trade-Offs19 Nov 2025
- 2025Benchmarking LLM-Assisted Blue Teaming via Standardized Threat Hunting28 Sep 2025
- 2025Phishing Detection in the Gen-AI Era: Quantized LLMs vs Classical Models10 Jul 2025
- 2024Exposing LLM Vulnerabilities: Adversarial Scam Detection and Performance1 Dec 2024
- 2024Multimodal Large Language Models for Phishing Webpage Detection and Identification12 Aug 2024